2001
DOI: 10.1080/10304310120086867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debating Reality-TV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of a reality TV show for academic research raises specific questions regarding whether an artificial environment (e.g., TV) changes behaviors (Hight, 2001). A number of researchers have used the natural experiments of game shows to investigate people's attitude to risk aversion, expected utility theory, endowment, heterogeneity and discrimination.…”
Section: Validity Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a reality TV show for academic research raises specific questions regarding whether an artificial environment (e.g., TV) changes behaviors (Hight, 2001). A number of researchers have used the natural experiments of game shows to investigate people's attitude to risk aversion, expected utility theory, endowment, heterogeneity and discrimination.…”
Section: Validity Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le succès de la téléréalité repose sur plusieurs éléments culturels, sociologiques et psychologiques : l'identification (Miller 2000 : 11 ;Reiss et Wiltz 2004), l'évasion (Lane 2000), l'individualisme (Briscoe 2000), le pouvoir (Biltereyst 2004 : 9), l'élimination (Mehl 1996), des normes rassurantes (Bonnet 2003 : 34), un sentiment d'unité (Beaucher 2004) et le voyeurisme (Dovey 2000 ;Hight 2001 ;Beaucher 2004 ;Eaves et Savoie 2005 : 95). Il y a donc dans la téléréalité une forme de narrativité très proche du téléspectateur.…”
Section: Quand La Vérité Est Un Mensongeunclassified
“…Both have also been the objects of controversy over the past years. Vivid debates have dismissed the new breed of factual programs as "freakshows," "trash," or "tabloid" TV, accusing them of, among other things, voyeurism and sensationalism (see Dovey 2000;Hight 2001). Despite undeniable ethical implications, there seems to be no way back, as "real" private life has quickly become a legitimate subject for television.…”
Section: Border Crossingmentioning
confidence: 99%