2012
DOI: 10.1097/nmd.0b013e31823e6795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debates on the Narcissism Conundrum

Abstract: The clinical implications of the term narcissism are a matter of continuous debate. This article critically examines pertinent literature of the last 12 years using a set of validators and attempting to identify narcissism as a trait, a domain, a dimension, or a personality disorder/type. Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD)-specific literature (particularly in epidemiological, developmental, and laboratory-testing areas) is scarce when compared with other personality disorders. A tendency to ideologically … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Narcissistic traits have been studied both in social or personality psychology as well as clinical contexts, especially with reference to narcissistic personality disorder (NaPD) 4 6 . While the case has been made that clinical research on narcissistic personality disorder might benefit from data obtained in non-clinical studies of narcissistic traits 7 , the relation between the conceptualisations in these two different lines of research is by no means clear and a matter of ongoing debates and research 3 , 6 , 8 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Narcissistic traits have been studied both in social or personality psychology as well as clinical contexts, especially with reference to narcissistic personality disorder (NaPD) 4 6 . While the case has been made that clinical research on narcissistic personality disorder might benefit from data obtained in non-clinical studies of narcissistic traits 7 , the relation between the conceptualisations in these two different lines of research is by no means clear and a matter of ongoing debates and research 3 , 6 , 8 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(pp. 303-304) In addition to these four PDs, antisocial PD was included by the DSM-5 Work group, and, late into its work, narcissistic PD was retained after initially being proposed for elimination (alarcon & sarabia, 2012;Pincus, 2011;ronningstam, 2013). nonetheless, the ClPs seems to have had had a significant influence on the DSM-5 PPDWg (Blashfield & reynolds, 2012).…”
Section: Determining the Need For Labels And Which Labels To Choosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…NPD did not exist before the DSM-111 in 1980, hardly encouraging belief in its scientific status. 35 It is also a psychoanalytic concept, going back to Freud and at odds with other diagnoses which are theory-free. A good example of its misuse and lack of validity is the way psychiatrists and psychologists went public to accuse Donald Trump of 'malignant narcissism' (in the process ignoring the Goldwater Rule).…”
Section: Sushruta J Health Policymentioning
confidence: 99%