Understanding Global Skills for 21st Century Professions 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97655-6_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debates on Global Skills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a number of reports in 2008 (Bourn, 2008: Bourn andNeal, 2008) and 2010 (Bentall, Blum and Bourn, 2009), I aimed to develop an approach to global skills that was influenced by critical pedagogical, development education and transformative learning thinking. I also aimed to locate an understanding of skills within a broader global context, as seen for example in our work with engineers (Bourn and Neal, 2008: 12) where we suggest that key to understanding global skills is recognising: -willingness to play an active role in society at local, national and international level (Bourn, 2008). However, as Selby and Kagawa commented in critiquing this conceptualisation, it appeared to have accepted the neo-liberal growth model of globalisation and was 'primarily concerned with workforce preparation for technocratic competitive efficacy' (Selby and Kagawa, 2014:147-8).…”
Section: Global Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a number of reports in 2008 (Bourn, 2008: Bourn andNeal, 2008) and 2010 (Bentall, Blum and Bourn, 2009), I aimed to develop an approach to global skills that was influenced by critical pedagogical, development education and transformative learning thinking. I also aimed to locate an understanding of skills within a broader global context, as seen for example in our work with engineers (Bourn and Neal, 2008: 12) where we suggest that key to understanding global skills is recognising: -willingness to play an active role in society at local, national and international level (Bourn, 2008). However, as Selby and Kagawa commented in critiquing this conceptualisation, it appeared to have accepted the neo-liberal growth model of globalisation and was 'primarily concerned with workforce preparation for technocratic competitive efficacy' (Selby and Kagawa, 2014:147-8).…”
Section: Global Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%