Death Management Practices

Cox, Gerry R.; Thompson, Neil

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05559-1_2

Managing Death: International Perspectives 2022

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-05559-1_2

|View full text |Cite

Death Management Practices

Gerry R. Cox

Neil Thompson

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Measurability: Mellalieu [23] assumes measurability to be a key factor in strategic planning as it fundamental to any control system with respect to the appropriate implementation of the strategy. According to Cox [25], strategic planning is appropriate if objectives are measurable, achievable, and time sensitive. Therefore, we interpret measurability as the ability of a strategic planning model to measure, monitor, and evaluate strategic objectives.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Using the Fuzzy Best Worst Method for Evaluating Strategic Planning Models

Ajripour

Hanne

2023

Processes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the last few decades, various strategic planning models have been suggested in the literature. It is difficult for a company to decide which of these models is most useful to adopt, as each of them shows different strengths and weaknesses. We consider this problem a multicriteria decision problem and investigate the evaluation of six strategic planning models in the context of smaller and medium-sized manufacturing companies in Iran. We consider a methodology that supports the analysis of the input from several decision-makers based on multiple criteria and assume vagueness in the input data elicited from them. For the purpose considered, the fuzzy best worst method (FBWM) appears appropriate. Based on a literature review, six evaluation criteria for strategic management models are considered: formality, clarity, measurability, objectivity, coverage, and consistency. These criteria are evaluated based on the input provided by thirteen managers using linguistic variables. FBWM is used to provide criteria weights that are used to determine fuzzy scores for the six considered strategic planning models. Finally, a defuzzification of the scores indicates the model by Wright is best suited for the application purpose. A consistency analysis included in FBWM shows that the input provided by the managers is sufficiently consistent.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Using the Fuzzy Best Worst Method for Evaluating Strategic Planning Models

Ajripour

Hanne

2023

Processes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Death Management Practices

Cited by 1 publication

References 6 publications

Using the Fuzzy Best Worst Method for Evaluating Strategic Planning Models

Using the Fuzzy Best Worst Method for Evaluating Strategic Planning Models

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About