1972
DOI: 10.2307/40126420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dear Scott/Dear Max. The Fitzgerald-Perkins Correspondence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is evident in the many letters he wrote back and forth with his publisher and friends, for instance(Kuehl and Bryer 1991).10 Even more often, this widespread criticism is documented but uncited. This speaks to a general perception, which no one bother to trace the exact origins of.11 While most early critics lauded the form of Fitzgerald's novel, there were almost as many negative reviews of the novel as there were positive reviews.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is evident in the many letters he wrote back and forth with his publisher and friends, for instance(Kuehl and Bryer 1991).10 Even more often, this widespread criticism is documented but uncited. This speaks to a general perception, which no one bother to trace the exact origins of.11 While most early critics lauded the form of Fitzgerald's novel, there were almost as many negative reviews of the novel as there were positive reviews.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%