1999
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47866-3_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dealing with Semantic Heterogeneity During Data Integration

Abstract: Multi-sources information systems, such as data warehouse systems, involve heterogeneous sources. In this paper, we deal with the semantic heterogeneity of the data instances. Problems may occur when confronting sources, each time different level of denominations have been used for the same value, e.g. "vermilion" in one source, and "red" in an other. We propose to manage this semantic heterogeneity by using a linguistic dictionary. "Semantic operators" allow a linguistic flexibility in the queries, e.g. two t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the database area, Embley et al (1999) have created ontologies for understanding web-based obituaries. Kedad and Metais (1999) propose to manage semantic heterogeneity by the use of a linguistic dictionary. propose that meta-level knowledge is needed to enable ontologies to evolve and subdivide, as necessary.…”
Section: Retrieval Scheme Underlying Approach Comments Abstractearchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the database area, Embley et al (1999) have created ontologies for understanding web-based obituaries. Kedad and Metais (1999) propose to manage semantic heterogeneity by the use of a linguistic dictionary. propose that meta-level knowledge is needed to enable ontologies to evolve and subdivide, as necessary.…”
Section: Retrieval Scheme Underlying Approach Comments Abstractearchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another research effort towards the application of NL techniques to facilitate the database design presents an automated database design system based on a naïve semantics ontology [StGU02]. Results on automatic documentation [BoWi04,ReML95], ontology creation [Kof05], and data cleaning [KeMe99,KeMe02], are not directly applicable to our environment, mostly due to the existence of complex transformations (e.g., functions and aggregations) in the ETL processes, which cannot be resolved using simply linguistic techniques. Research work regarding the validation of the model produced [MeML93,RoPr92], although orthogonal to our effort, still can be used for the validation of the outcome of our work.…”
Section: Application Of Nl In Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practical approaches to this problem (see e.g. [4,5,10,18]) are also based on operations on schemata, though no schema algebra is explicitly defined. Usually, a single schema is mapped onto a new schema inducing some kind of transformation of the instances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%