2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2009.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dealing with incomplete information in a fuzzy linguistic recommender system to disseminate information in university digital libraries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are three different methodologies to deal with incomplete LPRs, which are defined according to the three different linguistic decision frameworks: (i) 2-tuple LPRs [3,12,59];…”
Section: Managing Missing Preference Values In Lprsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are three different methodologies to deal with incomplete LPRs, which are defined according to the three different linguistic decision frameworks: (i) 2-tuple LPRs [3,12,59];…”
Section: Managing Missing Preference Values In Lprsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porcel and Herrera-Viedma [59] present an application in the context of fuzzy linguistic recommender systems that allows incomplete linguistic information.…”
Section: Managing Missing Preference Values In Lprsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18] a review of consensus models in a fuzzy environment can be found. There is, nowadays, a wide range of areas of application for these methods, from managerial to medical or engineering [6,8,10,30]. In particular, some fuzzy Delphi approaches have been proposed to deal with uncertainty and linguistic information [9,12,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although social networks provide a great infrastructure where people can make connections and exchange information, people are also exposed to unwanted connections and information. Researchers in the field proposed several methods to alleviate the problem such as collaborative filtering [1], [2] and recommender systems [3], [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%