2017
DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2017.1287130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dealing with homoplasy: osteology and phylogenetic relationships of the bizarre neobatrachian frogBaurubatrachus priceifrom the Upper Cretaceous of Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
7
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hyperossification is common in anuran fossils (possibly because hyperossified elements are more likely to be preserved in the fossil record) and is present in putative archeobatrachians, mesobatrachians, and neobatrachians (58). Identifying the phylogenetic placement of these fossil taxa is challenging because the material is often fragmentary, and hyperossification seems to result in artificial groupings based on homoplastic features (44,59,60), despite the differences in shape identified across hyperossified species in our study. Our results corroborate these previous findings: Hyperossification likely has evolved multiple times across crown-group anurans, leading to increased rates of shape evolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hyperossification is common in anuran fossils (possibly because hyperossified elements are more likely to be preserved in the fossil record) and is present in putative archeobatrachians, mesobatrachians, and neobatrachians (58). Identifying the phylogenetic placement of these fossil taxa is challenging because the material is often fragmentary, and hyperossification seems to result in artificial groupings based on homoplastic features (44,59,60), despite the differences in shape identified across hyperossified species in our study. Our results corroborate these previous findings: Hyperossification likely has evolved multiple times across crown-group anurans, leading to increased rates of shape evolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Additionally, many distantly related hyperossified lineages have converged on similar extreme skull shapes that may be linked to particular functions or behaviors. Including a broad taxonomic sample, using a molecular scaffold tree, conducting sensitivity analyses, and excluding or down-weighting characters possibly linked to hyperossification may eliminate some of these issues of homoplasy, but taxonomic uncertainty of these fossils will likely remain (60). Our framework will be useful in subsequent paleobiological studies of fossil frogs, especially when the 3D structure of the skull is recoverable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphology of the sacro-caudo-pelvic complex was represented by the discrete characters concerning the sacrum, urostyle, and pelvic girdle used by Gómez (2016) in his phylogenetic analyses of pipoid frogs, with the addition of three characters of the urostyle that were recently considered in the phylogenetic analysis of Báez and Gómez (2018). Also, several character states were added to incorporate the morphology exhibited by anuran taxa that have not been included in the analysis of Gómez (2016).…”
Section: Character Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphology of the sacro-caudo-pelvic complex was represented by the discrete characters concerning the sacrum, urostyle, and pelvic girdle used by Gómez (2016) in his phylogenetic analyses of pipoid frogs, with the addition of three characters of the urostyle recently considered in the phylogenetic analysis of Báez and Gómez (2018). Also, several character states were added in order to incorporate the morphology exhibited by anuran taxa that have not been included in the analysis of Gómez (2016).…”
Section: Character Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete data matrix consists of 34 characters (8 of the sacrum; 5 of the urostyle; 21 of the pelvic girdle) scored for 49 and 95 terminal taxa, in its non-expanded and expanded versions, respectively (for character list and data matrix see Supplementary Material). It is noteworthy that most of these characters, although with some modifications, have also been considered by Báez and Gómez (2018) in their phylogenetic analysis focused on neobatrachians. We are confident that this data matrix is also reliable for our present aims, since it is inclusive regarding characters of the sacro-caudo-pelvic complex, disrespecting if they are invariable across pipoids or their variation is restricted to autapomorphies (see Lloyd, 2016).…”
Section: Character Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%