Dealing with Discontinuity in Cancer Care Trajectories: Patients’ Solutions

Abstract

Introduction Patients with cancer require specialized care from different care providers, challenging continuity of care in terms of information, relationships, and/or management. The recognition of discontinuity of care has led to different initiatives by the healthcare system over the years. Yet, making use of the theory on boundary objects and brokers, this research explores the active role of patients themselves in resolving discontinuity along their care trajectories. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 patients to unravel the discontinuities that they experience and their attempts to resolve these. Interview data were analyzed using directed-content analysis informed by concepts from boundary crossing literature (i.e., data were searched for potential boundary objects and brokers). Results To re-establish continuity of care, patients actively use the objects and people provided by the healthcare system when these meet their needs. Patients also introduce own objects and people into the care trajectory. As such, information and management discontinuity can typically be resolved. Relational continuity appears to be more difficult to resolve, in some cases leaving patients to take drastic measures, such as changing care providers. Discussion The use of boundary crossing theory in improving care from a patient perspective is relatively novel. When patients and providers together address the objects and people that support establishing continuity of care, a continuous care process may be encouraged. We advocate an integrated approach, rather than provider or healthcare system initiatives exclusively, to patient care and continuity.Debbie Vermond and Souad el Habhoubi were shared first authorship.

The role of trust in the acceptance of adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients

“…Receiving conflicting information from different care providers tend to result in major uncertainty. A recent study showed that most cancer patients endeavor to establish a continuity of care and strive for a more active role in their treatment journey 51 …”

Hybridising in and out-of-school learning

“…When translated to research, this requires, for instance, research designs with hybrid and dynamic self-identifications (e.g., Meijer, 2011 andAzevedo andMann, 2021). In parallel, various person-oriented and person-centred approaches are emerging, that move beyond studying differences between groups of categorised individuals (e.g., "minorities" and "STEM-interested students") towards studying individual learners' experiencing, engaging, and gradually defining and developing themselves from the learners' own perspective Bakker, 2019 andVermond et al, 2022).…”

“…The advent of internet enabled wider sharing of knowledge (e.g., via Wikipedia, YouTube, and ResearchGate), including previously unrepresented perspectives (Lankshear, 2003). Moreover, with work and society becoming more dynamic and less predictable (the pandemic being a prime example), interorganisational, intercultural, and interdisciplinary efforts are increasingly considered necessary to address the bigger issues (e.g., related to economy, climate, healthcare, and racism) that are at stake Bakker, 2011 andVermond et al, 2022). According to both politicians and scholars, this entails that aside from basic and job-specific skills, additional skills, referred to as transferrable skills, lifelong learning competences and, increasingly, as 21 st century skills, should become part of educational curricula.…”