2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dealing with conflicting information from multiple nonlinear texts: Effects of prior attitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
25
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Text-belief consistency effects occurred in research regardless of whether prior beliefs were assessed only with one item (Kardash & Howell, 2000;Kardash & Scholes, 1996;Mason & Boscolo, 2004;McCrudden & Barnes, 2016;McCrudden & Sparks, 2014;Wiley, 2005) or with multiple items representing the two divergent argumentative stances on the controversy (Kobayashi, 2010(Kobayashi, , 2014Maier & Richter, 2013, 2014, 2016avan Strien et al, 2014;van Strien et al, 2016). Moreover, text-belief consistency effects also occurred even when they were not directly the focus of the research (Anmarkrud et al, 2014), and they were even stronger than the effects of the interventions (Kobayashi, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Text-belief consistency effects occurred in research regardless of whether prior beliefs were assessed only with one item (Kardash & Howell, 2000;Kardash & Scholes, 1996;Mason & Boscolo, 2004;McCrudden & Barnes, 2016;McCrudden & Sparks, 2014;Wiley, 2005) or with multiple items representing the two divergent argumentative stances on the controversy (Kobayashi, 2010(Kobayashi, , 2014Maier & Richter, 2013, 2014, 2016avan Strien et al, 2014;van Strien et al, 2016). Moreover, text-belief consistency effects also occurred even when they were not directly the focus of the research (Anmarkrud et al, 2014), and they were even stronger than the effects of the interventions (Kobayashi, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by van Strien, Brand-Gruwel, and Boshuizen (2014), 11th graders read 13 documents (one neutral, six pro, and six con) on the link between violent video games and aggression. In a hypertext environment, participants could choose the texts they wished to read and were given 35 min for reading and for writing an essay on the issue.…”
Section: Text-belief Consistency Effects On Comprehension Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rouet (2009) summarizes additional factors in a conceptual framework comprising three dimensions: individual variables, information resources, and problem context. Instructional designers should be aware that personal factors, such as an individual's domain-specific knowledge (Bråten, Strømsø, & Salmerón, 2011), attitudes and biases (Ford, Miller, & Moss, 2005;Van Strien, Brand-Gruwel, & Boshuizen, 2014), epistemic beliefs (Kammerer, Bråten, Gerjets, & Strømsø, 2012), and reading skills (Rouet, Ros, Goumi, Macedo-Rouet, & Dinet, 2011) can affect the learning processes and outcomes. Similarly, source factors (DeStefano & LeFevre, 2007) and task type (Wirth, Sommer, von Pape, & Karnowski, 2015) may influence variables in the learning process.…”
Section: 2instructional Principles Of Ips Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we did not look into this, one might argue that already existing beliefs had an effect. As other research has shown, prior attitudes affect the information problem-solving process in several ways (e.g., Brannon, Tagler, & Eagly, 2007;Fischer & Greitemeyer, 2010;Van Strien, Brand-Gruwel, & Boshuizen, 2014;White, 2014). Of importance to this study is the effect on keyword choice and search result selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…People tend to search for information that is consistent with their prior beliefs (Fischer & Greitemeyer, 2010), and hence formulate search queries that are strongly biased to finding supporting information (White, 2014). Furthermore, people with strong beliefs are more likely to choose information that is in line with their beliefs (Brannon, Tagler, & Eagly, 2007;Van Strien, Brand-Gruwel, & Boshuizen, 2014). Such prior beliefs could have prevented participants from searching critically and only looking for sources that justified their beliefs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%