2022
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1000598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deafness and early language deprivation influence arithmetic performances

Abstract: It has been consistently reported that deaf individuals experience mathematical difficulties compared to their hearing peers. However, the idea that deafness and early language deprivation might differently affect verbal (i.e., multiplication) vs. visuospatial (i.e., subtraction) arithmetic performances is still under debate. In the present paper, three groups of 21 adults (i.e., deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing controls) were therefore asked to perform, as fast and as accurately as possible, subtrac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 112 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference between deaf signers and hearing controls was not merely due to experience with hand processing, since finger‐counting configurations did not elicit any Group differences in Experiment 2. It therefore seems that not only behavioural performances on numerical tasks are influenced by the atypical sensorimotor experiences deaf signers have (Buyle & Crollen, 2022 ; Buyle et al, 2022 ), but also the brain correlates underlying finger‐number configurations are shaped by these experiences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference between deaf signers and hearing controls was not merely due to experience with hand processing, since finger‐counting configurations did not elicit any Group differences in Experiment 2. It therefore seems that not only behavioural performances on numerical tasks are influenced by the atypical sensorimotor experiences deaf signers have (Buyle & Crollen, 2022 ; Buyle et al, 2022 ), but also the brain correlates underlying finger‐number configurations are shaped by these experiences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%