Proceedings of the 17th International Web for All Conference 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3371300.3383337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deaf and hard-of-hearing users' prioritization of genres of online video content requiring accurate captions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even when captions exist, many are erroneous as they are auto-generated from automatic speech recognition algorithms [13]. It is not unusual for these algorithms to miss some words due to noise and to recognize the incorrect word when generating captions [12,35]. Human efforts are needed to correct those errors however video content creators were frequently unwilling or unable to do so [40,47].…”
Section: Related Work 21 Challenges Faced By Dhh Students In Video-ba...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when captions exist, many are erroneous as they are auto-generated from automatic speech recognition algorithms [13]. It is not unusual for these algorithms to miss some words due to noise and to recognize the incorrect word when generating captions [12,35]. Human efforts are needed to correct those errors however video content creators were frequently unwilling or unable to do so [40,47].…”
Section: Related Work 21 Challenges Faced By Dhh Students In Video-ba...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to further understand the importance of reading in the context of work, the survey asked participants to rate how often they read to learn about technical topics at work, as well as how often they watched videos for the same purpose. The rationale for including this question about watching videos is the increasing prevalence of online viewership [13], as well as using this set of two questions to help further quantify the amount of reading these users engage in (by comparing it to frequency responses they provide for some other activity, namely watching videos). Both of these questions were on the same 5-point scale used for the general reading frequency above, going from rarely to daily.…”
Section: Learning For Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for selecting thematic analysis was to enable the researcher to identify themes in the study that could help interpreting interviews and derive meanings. Various prior studies conducted on deaf and hard of hearing have found this method to be adequate [62,63].…”
Section: Study Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%