2013
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2013.849012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deadlock-free genetic scheduling for flexible manufacturing systems using Petri nets and deadlock controllers

Abstract: In this paper, a new deadlock-free scheduling method based on genetic algorithm and Petri net models of flexible manufacturing systems is proposed. The optimisation criterion is to minimise the makespan. In the proposed genetic scheduling algorithm, a candidate schedule is represented by a chromosome that consists of two sections: route selection and operation sequence. With the support of a deadlock controller, a repairing algorithm is proposed to check the feasibility of each chromosome and fix infeasible ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first example has been described in Section II, the second is an FMS taken from a real automated manufacturing workstation [24], [25], while the last example is a well studied FMS problem with flexible part routing and multiple resource capacity [7]- [9], [19], [31]. Five different cases of DL-prone situations are considered to investigate the impact of resource competitions and limited buffer capacity on FMS scheduling.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The first example has been described in Section II, the second is an FMS taken from a real automated manufacturing workstation [24], [25], while the last example is a well studied FMS problem with flexible part routing and multiple resource capacity [7]- [9], [19], [31]. Five different cases of DL-prone situations are considered to investigate the impact of resource competitions and limited buffer capacity on FMS scheduling.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case 5 is the third FMS example [7]- [9], [19], [31] that consists of four machines M 1 , M 2 , M 3 , and M 4 and three robots R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 . Each machine can hold two parts at the same time while the robots can move only one part at a time.…”
Section: E Case 5-routing Flexibility With Multiple Resource Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations