2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

20
248
10
26

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 340 publications
(304 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(44 reference statements)
20
248
10
26
Order By: Relevance
“…The dead to live wood ratio of sessile oak in Runcu Grosi (30%) was higher than that of silver fir in Sinca (21%), whereas the dead to live wood ratio of beech was similar for both forests (6% vs. 7%, respectively). At the stand level, the dead to live ratio was approximately 30% in Runcu Grosi, a value very close to the mean of long-established submontane/lowland reserves found by Christensen et al (2005). In contrast, in Sinca the ratio averaged 15% (Petritan et al, 2015), approximately half the value of long-established montane European beech reserves (36%; Christensen et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dead to live wood ratio of sessile oak in Runcu Grosi (30%) was higher than that of silver fir in Sinca (21%), whereas the dead to live wood ratio of beech was similar for both forests (6% vs. 7%, respectively). At the stand level, the dead to live ratio was approximately 30% in Runcu Grosi, a value very close to the mean of long-established submontane/lowland reserves found by Christensen et al (2005). In contrast, in Sinca the ratio averaged 15% (Petritan et al, 2015), approximately half the value of long-established montane European beech reserves (36%; Christensen et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Korpel', 1995;Tabaku, 2000;Vrška et al, 2001;Oheimb et al, 2007). In a review of data concerning dead wood quantity across beech forest reserves around Europe, Christensen et al (2005) ). The dead to live wood ratio of sessile oak in Runcu Grosi (30%) was higher than that of silver fir in Sinca (21%), whereas the dead to live wood ratio of beech was similar for both forests (6% vs. 7%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences for mean stand-structure values increase if we compare the lower structural values of Etna beech stands with other bibliographic data of beech stands located at northern latitudes and under more favourable macroclimatic conditions (e.g. Peters 1997; various authors cited in Christensen et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Williams-Linera et al 2000;Gea-Izquierdo et al 2004;Shimano 2006;Guo & Werger 2010;Martínez-Pastur et al 2012). Similarly different studies have been conducted on European beech stands, especially at their southern mountain-Mediterranean edge (Poli & Puzzolo 1999;Christensen et al 2005;Peñ uelas et al 2007;Tsiripidis et al 2007;Mercurio & Spampinato 2008;Manes et al 2010;Papalexandris & Milios 2010). In these marginal locations, a typical middleEuropean species, such as the F. sylvatica, is particularly subject to the influence of current climate change processes, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[68]). This is likely the consequence of several factors, with the most important being the increased mortality of conifers, relatively long degradation time of conifer logs [29,[69][70][71] and the long-lasting degradation of standing silver fir and common beech stems [72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%