Proceedings International Conference on Parallel Processing
DOI: 10.1109/icpp.2002.1040864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dead timestamp identification in Stampede

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The less restrictive nature of the Stampede programming model allows conception of different types of algorithms for GVT calculation like the one described in [8]. In [5] we have proposed yet another algorithm that uses application-level knowledge enabling garbage collection based entirely on local events with no reliance on any global mechanism.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The less restrictive nature of the Stampede programming model allows conception of different types of algorithms for GVT calculation like the one described in [8]. In [5] we have proposed yet another algorithm that uses application-level knowledge enabling garbage collection based entirely on local events with no reliance on any global mechanism.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of DGC, the forward and backward propagation of timestamp guarantees are instigated by put/get operations on channels. In a companion paper [5], we experimentally compared the performance of these three GC algorithms in the context of a real-time color-based people tracker application that was developed at Compaq CRL [11]. We use memory footprint -the amount of memory used for buffering timestamped items in the Stampede channels by the application as a function of real time -as the metric for performance evaluation.…”
Section: Enhancements To the Dgc Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations