2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2017.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dead time corrections for inbeam γ -spectroscopy measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Abbene & Gerardi evaluated the dead-time in the fast and slow channel according to the classical dead-time models, paralyzable model and non-paralyzable model (Abbene & Gerardi, 2015;Knoll, 2000). For the low-counting-rate condition, Boromiza et al (2017) made use of the Poisson distribution principle followed by the true counting rate and used the detected counting rate instead of the true counting rate to calculate the correction factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbene & Gerardi evaluated the dead-time in the fast and slow channel according to the classical dead-time models, paralyzable model and non-paralyzable model (Abbene & Gerardi, 2015;Knoll, 2000). For the low-counting-rate condition, Boromiza et al (2017) made use of the Poisson distribution principle followed by the true counting rate and used the detected counting rate instead of the true counting rate to calculate the correction factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%