2021
DOI: 10.1111/itor.13041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DEA cross‐efficiency aggregation based on preference structure and acceptability analysis

Abstract: Although a considerable amount of efforts have been made to overcome the drawbacks of traditional equal aggregation in the Data Envelopment Analysis cross‐efficiency evaluation, the endogenous preference structures in the cross‐efficiency matrix are still largely unexplored. We first untangle both preferential differences denoting the preference degrees among different Decision Making Unit (DMU), and preferential priorities denoting the favorite ranking of the DMUs. A revised cross‐efficiency matrix is formula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DEA methods were also found in security systems [15] and transport analysis [16]. The paper [17] concludes that while much effort has been made to overcome the disadvantages of traditional equal aggregation in Data Volume Analysis cross-performance, the endogenous preference structures in the cross-performance matrix are still largely unexplored. Finally, the DEA method was used to study the effectiveness of intermodal terminals [18].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DEA methods were also found in security systems [15] and transport analysis [16]. The paper [17] concludes that while much effort has been made to overcome the disadvantages of traditional equal aggregation in Data Volume Analysis cross-performance, the endogenous preference structures in the cross-performance matrix are still largely unexplored. Finally, the DEA method was used to study the effectiveness of intermodal terminals [18].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…If the tested objects have standard features that can be visualised, the outlays can be compared with the obtained results [17], provided that external factors will not influence the performance result. This method allows the index results to be extended with the parameters necessary for the correct effectiveness analysis.…”
Section: A General Lookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These decision-making indicators can provide informative and reliable ranking results; further, they can provide feedback for management enlightenment. Therefore, compared to other decision-making methods, the SMAA-2 method is favored by decision-makers (Song et al, 2021a(Song et al, , 2021bZhang et al, 2021;Fu and Li, 2021;Wei et al, 2021).…”
Section: Smaa-2 Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%