2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-7705-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DEA and Cooperative Game Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the proposed approach can be placed in this category. As regards cooperative games approaches in DEA that are not related to the ranking of DMUs, the reader is referred to Lozano et al (2016), where a number of TU games approaches, as well as Nash Bargaining games approaches are reviewed (see also Lozano et al (2015), and Hinojosa et al (2016)). Among the papers reviewed in Lozano et al (2015) that apply TU games and, in particular, the Shapley value, the one that is more relevant to this research is Li and Liang (2010), which proposes a cooperative game in which the players are the input and output variables and the grand coalition is the total set that includes all the inputs and outputs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the proposed approach can be placed in this category. As regards cooperative games approaches in DEA that are not related to the ranking of DMUs, the reader is referred to Lozano et al (2016), where a number of TU games approaches, as well as Nash Bargaining games approaches are reviewed (see also Lozano et al (2015), and Hinojosa et al (2016)). Among the papers reviewed in Lozano et al (2015) that apply TU games and, in particular, the Shapley value, the one that is more relevant to this research is Li and Liang (2010), which proposes a cooperative game in which the players are the input and output variables and the grand coalition is the total set that includes all the inputs and outputs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides essential concepts, methods, and models used to assess the interaction of different agents in competitive markets and solve conflicts. Hence, notions like fairness and equity when finding allocations of the total amount the grand coalition can obtain are significant [23,59,60].…”
Section: Cooperative Games In the Dea Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [23] stated that two main types of cooperative games apply in the DEA context: bargaining and transferable utility games (TU games). Using these games, we can address several DEA problems, such as defining common weights, defining variables relevant for efficiency measurement, efficiency decomposition, and obtaining consensus between criteria to evaluate performance.…”
Section: Cooperative Games In the Dea Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lozano et al. 25 reviewed some transferable utility (TU) games and Nash bargaining games for combining the DEA model with game theory approach. Li et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%