2011
DOI: 10.3406/onoma.2011.1724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De toponimia vasco-pirenaica: sobre el sufijo -otz, -oz(e)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Orain erresuma zaharrean bokala + txistukari lepokaria duten toponimoak ukitu nahi ditugu, berriro ere (ikus Salaberri, 2011c). Frankotan -az, -ez, -iz, -oz, -uz bukaerak aipatu dira (erraterako Menéndez Pidalek & Tovarrek [1962, 383. or.…”
Section: Aurrekariakunclassified
“…Orain erresuma zaharrean bokala + txistukari lepokaria duten toponimoak ukitu nahi ditugu, berriro ere (ikus Salaberri, 2011c). Frankotan -az, -ez, -iz, -oz, -uz bukaerak aipatu dira (erraterako Menéndez Pidalek & Tovarrek [1962, 383. or.…”
Section: Aurrekariakunclassified
“…data concerning ancient onomastics result from the manifold contributions by Koldo Mitxelena and especially Joakin Gorrotxategi. the sources for later onomastics data are made up by diverse document compilations which have, for the most part, been published in recent years. these data are gathered, at least partially and in what concerns Álava, in the above-mentioned work (Salaberri Zaratiegi, 2015). the interested reader can make use of it whenever he wishes to find out the data contained in a specific Alavese toponym.…”
Section: Patxi Salaberri Zaratiegi Iker Salaberri Izkomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the same thing occurs with the trill in the term lur "earth" (lurra with the article) on occasion: luharbil "lump", lühidorrez "over dry land", "by land" (as opposed to "by sea"). In case this should be considered a direct phonetic change, it would have tenuous typological support (Igartua, 2006: 521;2011: 896). this author (20062011: 908) prefers to think that, in the case of uhalde, uharte or uholde, the -h-was already present at the beginning of the second member, which is why one would be dealing with a dissimilation *hur-halde > *urhalde > uhalde.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%