De samenwerking tussen tandartsen en mondhygiënisten: van paradox naar oplossing

Reinders, Jan-Jaap; Blanksma, N.G.

doi:10.5177/ntvt.2012.06.12110

Cited by 1 publication

(5 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Sometimes there is resistance in the professional field to planned proposed legislative amendments regarding task redistribution 17 and the resulting change in collaboration. 11 These changed roles are well defined on paper by legislation, but there are few existing role models in the field. 21 We therefore consider it beneficial for students to start interprofessional learning early in their study programmes.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This makes it difficult for the “novice” professionals to collaborate interprofessionally to the full scope of their practice. Sometimes there is resistance in the professional field to planned proposed legislative amendments regarding task redistribution and the resulting change in collaboration . These changed roles are well defined on paper by legislation, but there are few existing role models in the field .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…9 Accommodating changes in oral healthcare, dental treatments and wishes of the individual client requires a complex multiskilled oral healthcare team. 10,11 Task redistribution and interprofessional collaboration add to the delivery of good quality, (cost) effective, efficient, accessible, comfortable and person-oriented healthcare. 12,13 Together with changes in content, legislation and policies, the scope of dental hygiene practice continues to develop.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…17 In the Netherlands, the redistribution of tasks offers a more autonomous role for dental hygienists, which gives them an area of expertise, professional autonomy, self-organisation and legal recognition. 11 Currently there is a substantial overlap in the tasks of dentists and dental hygienists ( Figure 1). Based on experiences with the substitution in the field of nurse practitioners and physician assistants (who are performing medical procedures traditionally carried out by doctors), we expect that, due to the more effective and efficient use of everyone's competences, this overlap will decrease.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Tasks not needing an assignment from a dentist in the field of prevention and periodontology, the so‐called non‐reserved procedures are similar in the Netherlands to those in other countries . In the Netherlands, the redistribution of tasks offers a more autonomous role for dental hygienists, which gives them an area of expertise, professional autonomy, self‐organisation and legal recognition . Currently there is a substantial overlap in the tasks of dentists and dental hygienists (Figure ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in education of dentists and dental hygienists and the impact on dental practice in the Netherlands: A qualitative study

Creugers

Hollaar

Laurant

2019

Eur J Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. AbstractIntroduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the perceptions of dentists and dental hygienists regarding their own and each other's roles in interprofessional collaboration following a clinical interprofessional educational programme (CIEP) as part of their graduate programme at Radboud university medical center (Radboudumc) and HAN University of Applied Sciences (HAN UAS), Nijmegen, the Netherlands, respectively. Perceptions were obtained at the end of their study (2014) and two years after their graduation (2016). Methods:A qualitative study was conducted using a questionnaire with open-ended questions. Sixty-two dentists and thirty-eight dental hygienists were invited. Theorybased analyses were applied in combination with principles of Grounded Theory to analyse and synthesise the collected data from the open-ended questions.Results: At baseline, 100% responded. At follow-up, thirty-two dentists (51.6%) and twenty-six dental hygienists (68.4%) responded; twenty-seven dentists (43.5%) and eighteen dental hygienists (47.4%) were included. Many similarities were found between baseline and follow-up regarding perceptions of each other's expertise and responsibility, learning from and with each other, and the behaviour of students and the "novice" professionals in interprofessional collaboration. Both dentists and dental hygienists experienced the CIEP as useful for interprofessional collaboration. The "novice" dentists and dental hygienists indicated that in dental practices interprofessional collaboration was less common. Conclusion:The CIEP resulted in more understanding amongst dentists and dental hygienists with regard to interprofessional roles, but in practice the "novice" dentists and dental hygienists face difficulties in applying the interprofessional roles. K E Y W O R D Scollaboration, dental hygienists, dentists, education, interprofessional education

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%