2020
DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De novo variants in SUPT16H cause neurodevelopmental disorders associated with corpus callosum abnormalities

Abstract: IntroductionWhole-exome sequencing (WES) has identified de novo variants in chromatin remodelling genes in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD). We report on a novel genetic discovery in chromatin remodelling in patients with NDD who also have corpus callosum (CC) anomalies.ObjectiveTo discover novel genes linked to both CC anomalies and NDD.MethodsClinical WES was performed for evaluation of NDD, identifying five patients with de novo variants in SUPT16H, a subunit of the FACT (facilitates chromat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we carried out further analyses of the H3-L61R mutant and found that whereas it allows for cell viability when wild-type histone H3 is co-expressed in cells, it also confers strong dominant defects on Spt16-gene interactions. Our findings, combined with another recent study implicating mutant versions of the human Spt16 protein in neurodevelopmental disorders [ 21 ], point to a possible molecular mechanism driving disease state in individuals expressing H3.3 L61R.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In the present study, we carried out further analyses of the H3-L61R mutant and found that whereas it allows for cell viability when wild-type histone H3 is co-expressed in cells, it also confers strong dominant defects on Spt16-gene interactions. Our findings, combined with another recent study implicating mutant versions of the human Spt16 protein in neurodevelopmental disorders [ 21 ], point to a possible molecular mechanism driving disease state in individuals expressing H3.3 L61R.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…CHD8 is currently thought to be one of the most common genetic drivers of ASD, and is often additionally associated with macrocephaly, overgrowth, facial minor anomalies and gastrointestinal problems [21][22][23][24]. SUPT16H was recently linked to a NDD consisting of DD/ID, ASD, seizures, precocious puberty, craniofacial minor anomalies, and corpus callosum abnormalities, but not macrocephaly [25]. Notably, neither of our three patients had increased head circumference; on the contrary, SEG2_49 had microcephaly (with generalized somatic underdevelopment).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CHD8 is currently thought to be one of the most common genetic drivers of ASD, and is often additionally associated with macrocephaly, overgrowth, facial minor anomalies and GI problems (15)(16)(17)(18). SUPT16H was recently linked to a neurodevelopmental disorder consisting of DD/ID, ASD, seizures, precocious puberty, craniofacial minor anomalies, and corpus callosum abnormalities, but not macrocephaly (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%