2020
DOI: 10.1002/humu.24080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De novo mutation and skewed X‐inactivation in girl with BCAP31 ‐related syndrome

Abstract: Full genome analysis of a young girl with deafness, dystonia, central hypomyelination, refractory seizure, and fluctuating liver function impairment revealed a heterozygous, de novo variant in the BCAP31 gene on chromosome Xq28 (NM_001256447.2:c.92G>A), mutations of which caused the X‐linked recessive severe neurologic disorder deafness, dystonia, and cerebral hypomyelination. Reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction of the patient's white blood cells showed the absence of wild‐type BCAP31 messenger RNA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The de novo phased genome assemblies from 10xG WGS were compared to identify SNVs and (SVs from 10xG WGS and OGM through the well-established FGA pipeline. 11 , 27 Briefly, the suspected SNVs and SVs were derived from the FGA pipeline, and common SNVs/SVs and synonymous SNVs were based on information from the 1000 Genomes Project, Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD 28 ), Exome Aggregation Consortium, benign variants in ClinVar, and ACMG recommendations InterVar. 29 , 30 Then, we evaluate each gene affected by SNVs, SVs, or combination of SNVs and SVs in detail.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The de novo phased genome assemblies from 10xG WGS were compared to identify SNVs and (SVs from 10xG WGS and OGM through the well-established FGA pipeline. 11 , 27 Briefly, the suspected SNVs and SVs were derived from the FGA pipeline, and common SNVs/SVs and synonymous SNVs were based on information from the 1000 Genomes Project, Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD 28 ), Exome Aggregation Consortium, benign variants in ClinVar, and ACMG recommendations InterVar. 29 , 30 Then, we evaluate each gene affected by SNVs, SVs, or combination of SNVs and SVs in detail.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%