2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01948.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De novo 16p13.11 microdeletion identified by high‐resolution array CGH in a fetus with increased nuchal translucency

Abstract: Objective  We investigated the application of high‐resolution microarray‐based comparative genomic hybridisation (array CGH) on a fetus showing increased nuchal translucency (NT).Design  Case study.Setting  Tertiary referral obstetrics unit.Sample  Pregnant woman attended the antenatal clinic.Methods  Conventional karyotyping and genetic test was carried out for the alpha‐globin gene. High‐resolution array CGH using the high‐density 244K Agilent microarray was performed on fetal blood sample by cordocentesis t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional genetic investigations in fetuses with enlarged NT and normal conventional karyotype, such as molecular testing (subtelomere MLPA and CGH microarrays) are promising techniques for identifying microscopic genomic aberrations (microdeletions, unbalanced translocations) responsible for syndromic associations including structural anomalies and mental retardation (Lespinasse et al, 2004;Chen et al, 2005;Farina et al, 2006;Law et al, 2008). However, as their value has not yet been investigated prospectively in large series, caution should be used in interpreting isolated findings in fetuses without structural anomalies.…”
Section: Management Of Euploid Fetuses With Increased Ntmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional genetic investigations in fetuses with enlarged NT and normal conventional karyotype, such as molecular testing (subtelomere MLPA and CGH microarrays) are promising techniques for identifying microscopic genomic aberrations (microdeletions, unbalanced translocations) responsible for syndromic associations including structural anomalies and mental retardation (Lespinasse et al, 2004;Chen et al, 2005;Farina et al, 2006;Law et al, 2008). However, as their value has not yet been investigated prospectively in large series, caution should be used in interpreting isolated findings in fetuses without structural anomalies.…”
Section: Management Of Euploid Fetuses With Increased Ntmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9] One of them is the 16p13.11 microdeletion syndrome characterized by developmental delay/intellectual disabilities (DD/ID) with or without multiple congenital abnormalities. [6][7][8]10,11 Although 16p13.11 microduplication was initially considered to be a rare benign variant, 6 accumulated evidence indicates that this duplication is enriched in patients with autism, 8 unexplained ID, 10 schizophrenia, 12 epilepsy, 13 and attentiondeficit hyperactivity disorder. 14 Since 2008, we have evaluated 1645 consecutive pediatric patients by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) technique using the Agilent Human Genome Microarray Kit 244K platform according to the described protocol.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 16p13.11 microdeletions are pleiotropic genomic variants with broad phenotypic manifestations, including neurodevelopmental phenotypes such as autism, mental retardation, epilepsy and learning difficulties and non-CNS phenotypes such as physical dysmorphisms and congenital anomalies. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] This variable phenotypic expressivity represents a challenge for clinical diagnosis because similar clinical features have been associated with a number of other genomic variations (eg, del1q21.1 or del15q11.2), and a characteristic common phenotype for the 16p13.11 microdeletion carriers has not yet been identified. Furthermore, clinical diagnosis can also be hampered by the presence of 'second-hits', additional pathogenic variations in other genomic regions that act in concert with the 16p13.11 microdeletions, and are able to exacerbate or mask some of their phenotypic symptoms.…”
Section: Clinical Sensitivity (Proportion Of Positive Tests If the DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Interval II (chr16:15.48-16.32 Mb, GRCh37/hg19) represents the critical region of the genomic variation, being contained in the great majority of the 16p13.11 microdeletions identified so far. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] It encompasses a core set of eight protein-coding genes, including NDE1, the strongest candidate gene for the neurodevelopmental phenotypes associated with the 16p13.11 microdeletions. NDE1 encodes the nuclear distribution protein nudE homolog 1, a centrosomal protein that has a crucial role in the process of mammalian encephalisation and human cerebral cortex growth.…”
Section: Mutational Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%