De‐naturalising transit migration. Theory and methods of an ethnographic regime analysis

Abstract

Against the background of the research project entitled ‘Transit Migration’ (2002–2004), on migration regimes in Turkey, Greece and the Balkan region, the article will discuss methodological and conceptual problems and challenges of qualitative studies of transit migration. By analysing diverse practices and conditions of ‘transit migrations’ the article will argue against attempts to qualitatively define the phenomena. Rather, it suggests applying the concept of ‘precarious transit zone’ in order to grasp the complexity, unsteadiness, and multi‐directionality of many migrational ‘transit‐biographies’. On an ethnographic level the concept of ‘transit zone’ allows a consideration of different figures of transit migrants from those in the traditional sense of the term, visa‐overstayers or rejected asylum seekers transiting diverse countries on their way forward and increasingly also on their difficult way back to their countries of origin as well as the increasing number of migrants ‘stuck in mobility’. Moreover, the concept urges migration research to adopt an ‘ethnographic regime approach’, which implies a multi‐dimensional research design. It combines ethnographic research with discourse analyses and an analytical focus on the macro level. This shows that transit migration is not only shaped by migration related policies by the EU, nation‐states and international/ intergovernmental organisations, but it is shaped by ‘economies of transit’. Additionally an ethnographic regime approach also analyses the impact of academic research itself in re‐constructing categories used by the governing bodies. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Governing through Uncertainty: Experiences of Being a Refugee in Turkey as a Country for Temporary Asylum

“…As a consequence, these nuanced differences in representing persecution and trauma often result in labeling the claimant as 'non-credible', the foremost reason for rejecting asylum cases in many different countries (Kagan 2002). In other words, during asylum interviews there is little room for recognizing that migration biographies and 'true' stories of a lifetime are uneven, multi-directional, full of conflicts and contradictions, and hence difficult to sort out and make credible (Hess 2012;Norman 2006).…”

“…This 'securitization approach' can clearly be traced in the development of immigration and asylum policies in Turkey from the 1990s onward, wherein new strategies are continually being deployed to sort out and control the movement of refugees in the country (Biehl 2009). Since the mid-2000s in particular, Turkey has also been cooperating extensively with the EU on issues of migration management, setting into motion the gradual 'Europeanization' of national immigration and asylum policies and border regime practices, which goes in tandem with securitization (Düvell 2012;Faist and Ette 2007;Hess 2012;Özçürümez and Şenses 2011).…”

Theorising Chance: Capturing the Role of Ad Hoc Social Interactions in Migrants' Trajectories

“…African migration to Europe has become for many migrants a long-lasting, fragmented, and highly risky endeavour (Collyer, 2007;Schapendonk, 2011). It is characterised by a high degree of unpredictability and often includes stays in 'waiting hubs' or 'transit zones', which may last from a few days to a lifetime (Collyer et al, 2012;Hess, 2012). We conducted our study prior to the 2014 outbreak of the armed conflict, when Ukraine was such a hub.…”

“We are all brothers here”: The making of a life by Chechen refugees in Poland

“…Political efforts to control and discipline the movement of underprivileged migrants are burgeoning in regions at the outer territorial border of the European Union (Collyer, Düvell, & De Haas, ; Düvell, ). In regions at the external European border, the migration regime disrupts migrants' plans, redirects their routes, and—to various degrees—reduces their rights (Hess, ). In doing so, the regime supports the transformation of European space, the organisation of European markets, and the formation of European citizenship (Andrijasevic, ; Hess, ).…”

“…In regions at the external European border, the migration regime disrupts migrants' plans, redirects their routes, and—to various degrees—reduces their rights (Hess, ). In doing so, the regime supports the transformation of European space, the organisation of European markets, and the formation of European citizenship (Andrijasevic, ; Hess, ).…”