De Gaulle et la République

Rudelle, Odile

doi:10.3917/puf.berst.1992.01.0383

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Во Франции, помимо огромного числа исследователей собственно исторической фигуры Ш. де Голля, сложилась отдельная когорта специалистов по своего рода «теории голлизма». Это Ж. де Монтале (de Montalais 1968), С. Берстейн (Berstein 2002), Ж. Тушар (Touchard 1978), Ш. Моразе (Morazé 1971, Ж. Шарло (Charlot 1969), О. Рюдель (Rudelle 2010), Ж. Блок-Моранж (Bloch-Morhange 1963), Ф. Шуазель (Choisel 1987(Choisel , 2016, Ж.-К. Петифис (Petitfils 1993), Ж. Тейтжан (Teitgen 1980), Ж. Сустель (Soustelle 1967), А. Пейрефит (Peyrefitte 1994(Peyrefitte , 1997(Peyrefitte , 2000 и др.…”

Section: голлизм и атлантизм как две взаимоисключающие идеологииunclassified

Gaullism and Atlanticism are Main Foreign Policy Paradigms of the Fifth Republic

Mikhailov

2022

Vestnik MGIMO-universiteta

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gaullism and Atlanticism in the foreign policy of the Fifth Republic appear as two fundamental but mutually exclusive ideological paradigms that, in various combinations, traditionally determined Paris’s behavior on the international stage. A comparative analysis of the ideological constructions of Gaullism and Atlanticism shows the fundamental reason for the conceptual discrepancy between the two doctrines. Gaullism calls on France to preserve its status as a world power at any cost. Atlanticism serves the geostrategic purpose of maintaining American military and political control over Europe. For this reason, Atlanticism does not recognize any other world powers within the Western universe but the United States.A retrospective view of the Gaullist and Atlanticist interaction reveals a steady trend towards a gradual shift of the Fifth Republic from Charles de Gaulle’s diplomacy principles. This trend led to the beginning in 2007 of a new era of the absolute dominance of Atlanticism in French foreign policy compared with the post-war period of the Fourth Republic.The advent of this era was marked by a significant improvement in France’s relations with the United States and NATO and increasing French activism on the track of Euro-federalist integra-tion, but, in general, by the perceptible banalization of France’s voice in international affairs.The results of this study help build future relations between Russia and France.

show abstract

Section: голлизм и атлантизм как две взаимоисключающие идеологииunclassified

Gaullism and Atlanticism are Main Foreign Policy Paradigms of the Fifth Republic

Mikhailov

2022

Vestnik MGIMO-universiteta

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The FLN fought a French colonial power that had been in the country since 1830 and that had created a quasi-apartheid rule over the country. Through assassinations and guerrilla action, the FLN sought to kick out the French and to create the possibility of an independent Algeria (Droz and Lever, 1982; Hope, 1977; Rudelle, 1988). The French response was terrible: torture and executions quickly became everyday occurrences, and by the time the war had ended in 1962 with the creation of a free Algeria, more than 300,000 people had died and many thousands had been tortured by the French army.…”

Section: The Crisis De Gaulle’s Double Game and The Boring Lifementioning

confidence: 99%

“…A complicated double game was being played out in which de Gaulle used the military coup to come upon the scene using the fear of a military dictatorship, all the while distancing himself from Massu’s coup and making it appear as if power came to him and not the other way around (see Rudelle, 1988: 103). Maurice Blanchot wrote about de Gaulle’s cunning double game, describing his behind-the-scenes actions as an organisation of doubt and a transformation of despair into agitation.…”

Section: The Crisis De Gaulle’s Double Game and The Boring Lifementioning

confidence: 99%

The spectacle of de Gaulle’s coup d’état: The Situationists on de Gaulle’s coming to power

Rasmussen

2016

French Cultural Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article analyses the Situationists' reading of the situation in May-June 1958 when Charles de Gaulle came to power in France in the middle of the Algerian civil war, which threatened to tear France apart. The Situationists analysed the dramatic events as a counter-revolution not unlike previous historical events where counter-revolutionary figures like Louis Bonaparte and Franco derailed potentially revolutionary developments. In that regard de Gaulle came to represent the spectacle (le spectacle) and its blockade of revolutionary energies for the Situationist group. De Gaulle's extremely conscious staging of himself as the saviour of France and his ability to use the new medium of television presented the Situationists with an example of how the modern capitalist state sought to fix people in a passive situation unable to intervene and take control of their lives.

show abstract

De Gaulle et la République

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Gaullism and Atlanticism are Main Foreign Policy Paradigms of the Fifth Republic

Gaullism and Atlanticism are Main Foreign Policy Paradigms of the Fifth Republic

The spectacle of de Gaulle’s coup d’état: The Situationists on de Gaulle’s coming to power

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About