De-Europeanization by Default? Germany's EU Policy in Defense and Asylum

Abstract

Since the end of the Cold War and unification, Germany's policy toward and within the European Union (EU) has undergone significant changes. Once a model “Europeanist,” Germany has become increasingly reluctant to support the progressive implementation of key projects of European integration. Neither an instance of a planned strategic change nor a result of an inevitable adaptation to structural shifts at the systemic level, these changes in German foreign policy, incremental yet significant as they are, evade both deterministic and voluntaristic accounts of foreign policy change. Integrating insights from foreign policy analysis, integration theory, and social theory, the article develops an innovative framework for analysis that is applied to Germany's European asylum and refugee policy as well as its security and defense policy. The origins of both policy fields at the European level can be traced back to initiatives that were supported by or even originated in Germany. However, as the 1990s progressed Germany increasingly obstructed further institutionalization. While in the field of asylum and refugee policy the Amsterdam summit marks a clear turning point in Germany's position, the transformation of German policies on European security and defense proceeded rather as an incremental decrease in material support, aggravating substantive progress in the policy field more broadly. An unanticipated consequence of earlier initiatives, in both cases Germany has found it increasingly difficult to live up to the expectations it has helped to raise.

Europeanization of Legal Culture: an Exploratory Essay

“…Слід зазначити, що процес європеїзації впливає на різні сегменти національних правових систем, зокрема, правосуддя, зовнішню, безпекову та оборонну політику [54][55][56], соціальну політику [57][58][59][60] тощо. При цьому не тільки окремі системи національного права, а й різні галузі в рамках національного права неоднаково реагують і зазнають процесу європеїзації, а отже, мають на виході різні результати.…”

Theorizing many Europes: a four-fold taxonomy

“…Degreeism is the tendency to treat binary categories as continuous variables by locating them in a continuum and confounding differences in kind with differences in degrees (Sartori, 1991, p. 248). This has become particularly visible in the literature on Europeanization and the emerging scholarship on 'de-Europeanization' (Aydın-Düzgit, 2016;Hellmann et al, 2005) that study Europe and its effects on member, candidate and partner states.…”

One step forward, two steps back: the ambiguous role of Germany in EU Asylum policies

“…In the case of asylum, state elites comprise officials from the Interior Ministry, as well as regional (Länder) and local authorities responsible for the distribution and living conditions of asylum-seekers. While there is a potential for conflict between different levels of governance in a federal system (see Hellmann et al 2005), Interior Ministry officials have tended to dominate policy-making on EU-related policies. In general, these officials tend to hold restrictive positions on asylum and prioritise security (Guiraudon 2000;Lavenex 2001, pp.…”