(De)coupling of our eyes and our mind’s eye: A dynamic process perspective on attentional bias.

Abstract

We aimed to illuminate the theorized, yet empirically elusive, connection between covert and overt attentional processes subserving attentional biases (AB). We found that covert and overt attentional processes were each expressed dynamically, fluctuating from moment-to-moment between phases of (over)engagement and phases of avoidance of threat stimuli. The key features of the temporal dynamics of covert and overt attentional processes were significantly correlated. Moreover, the real-time, dynamic expressions of overt and covert attentional processes were significantly coupled from trial-to-trial; and voluntary inhibition of overt attention decoupled their connection in time. In contrast to this dynamic process perspective on AB, when quantified through the decades-old paradigm conceptualizing AB as a static trait-like phenomenon, covert and overt attentional processes demonstrated (seemingly) no association and poor psychometrics. We discuss the implications of the findings for better understanding the nature of AB, its measurement, bio-psycho-behavioral correlates, and clinical modification. (PsycINFO Database Record

Eye-Tracking Evidence of a Maintenance Bias in Social Anxiety

“…Future studies should also focus on the generalization of our findings to clinical populations, on the differential impact of sad and angry stimuli on depressive participants, and on the status of social emotions as potential triggers of attention biases in social anxiety. Another interesting research avenue concerns the cross-trial temporal stability of the maintenance bias we found in our socially anxious participants, in line with concerns recently raised on the dynamic expression of attention biases across time (Amir et al, 2016; Zvielli et al, 2014).…”

Valence and Intensity of Video Stimuli of Dogs and Conspecifics in Sheep: Approach-Avoidance, Operant Response, and Attention

“…Tracking sheep’s head and ear movements and positions might not be ideal to measure visual attention because of the wide visual field of sheep. Therefore, using an eye tracking system might be an improvement [ 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 ]. However, it is unclear whether such a system could be calibrated to be used in species with a large visual field.…”

A developmental neuroscience perspective on affect-biased attention

“…Several studies performing this analysis have found evidence for biases in disengagement, rather than orienting, among anxious individuals (e.g., Cooper and Langton, 2006 , Koster et al, 2004 , Salemink et al, 2007 ). Others have suggested that variability in bias throughout attention tasks best capture the fluctuating patterns of attention that mark individual differences and risk ( Amir et al, 2016 , Naim et al, 2015 , Zvielli et al, 2014 , Zvielli et al, 2015 ).…”