2021 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/csci54926.2021.00044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DDS-Cerberus: Ticketing Performance Experiments and Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DDS-C is a novel security layer incorporating Kerberos ticketing with DDS publishers and subscribers, developed by two previous papers [10,11]. It provides additional security by validating nodes and preventing impersonation attacks.…”
Section: Dds-cerberus (Dds-c)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…DDS-C is a novel security layer incorporating Kerberos ticketing with DDS publishers and subscribers, developed by two previous papers [10,11]. It provides additional security by validating nodes and preventing impersonation attacks.…”
Section: Dds-cerberus (Dds-c)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides additional security by validating nodes and preventing impersonation attacks. The first DDS-C paper presented the initial DDS-C design proposal, and the second paper was based on latency measurements with ROS 2 [10,11]. The latency collections in the second paper determined that DDS-C does not hinder message sending and retrieval.…”
Section: Dds-cerberus (Dds-c)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DDS-C is a security layer that mitigates impersonation attacks [8][9][10]. It is integrated into DDS to provide participant authentication through Kerberos.…”
Section: Dds-cerberus (Dds-c)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DDS-C, a security layer for DDS, handles the authentication of DDS participants using Kerberos tickets [8][9][10]. This authentication mitigates impersonation attacks by verifying the identity of authenticated participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%