20th Annual Meeting of the Society for neuro-oncology, San Antonio, tX, USA,
18-22 november 2015The Society for Neuro-Oncology is the largest neuro-oncology meeting in the USA that meets annually and provides a multiday venue that showcases new brain cancer clinical trial results and basic research primarily pertaining to gliomas. The Society for Neuro-Oncology 2015 meeting comprising one education day, 2 days of premeetings and 3 days of presentation, over 200 oral presentations and 900 abstracts provides an overview of contemporary neurooncology that includes metastatic disease of the central nervous system as well as primary brain tumors. This review attempts to highlight select abstracts presented at this year's meeting in a short summary that provides a synopsis of a large and multifaceted meeting. A study by the Alliance consortium evaluated in a randomized trial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in 213 patients with 1-3 brain metastases (BM) (68% lung cancer related) [1]. The primary end point was cognitive progression at 3 months using six cognitive test instruments. Cognitive progression at 3 months (as reflected by immediate recall, delayed recall and verbal fluency) was more frequent following SRS + WBRT compared with SRS only (92 vs 64%). Intracranial tumor control at 3 and 6 months were better in the SRS + WBRT cohort (75.3 and 64.7% with SRS alone vs 93.7 and 88.4% with SRS + WBRT), however, overall survival (OS) was similar in both groups. The authors conclude that in patients with 1-3 BM, SRS only is the preferred therapy with less cognitive impact and similar survival. Not clear, however, from this study was whether the deterioration in cognitive function seen with SRS + WBRT was maintained at 6 months or were there data regarding progressive neurological disease as a cause of death in the two treatment arms. Essentially all studies in BM have failed to show a difference in OS and consequently the significance of this as an end point in BM trials is unclear. Lastly, there were no data regarding the need for salvage therapy in patients treated with SRS only.A study of 51 patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer and BM all of whom had progressed on crizotinib, an ALK inhibitor, were treated with the recently approved ALK inhibitor alectinib [2]. Patients with ALK + NSCL and BM were a subset of all patients enrolled in one of two prospective Phase II trials of alectinib. The intracranial response was 61% and median For reprint orders, please contact: reprints@futuremedicine.com