1988
DOI: 10.1080/00365599.1988.11690400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DDAVP Test For Renal Concentration Capacity: Age-related Reference Intervals

Abstract: The effect of different levels of fluid intake on the renal concentration test was evaluated. Maximal urinary osmolality did not significantly differ whether strict fluid restriction was kept or not. One side effect, namely headache, seemed more frequent after fluid deprivation than after a more liberal fluid intake. We suggest a practical approach to the performance of the urinary concentration test with DDAVP. The maximal urinary concentration after a single subcutaneous injection of 4 micrograms DDAVP was d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allowed us to conclude whether differences between ADPKD patients and healthy controls were due to the disease process itself, and not due to differences in age, sex distribution, or kidney function. These latter factors have been shown to influence maximal urine concentrating capacity (24,(36)(37)(38)(39). Second, we measured maximal endogenous urine concentrating capacity, as well as the reaction to DDAVP administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allowed us to conclude whether differences between ADPKD patients and healthy controls were due to the disease process itself, and not due to differences in age, sex distribution, or kidney function. These latter factors have been shown to influence maximal urine concentrating capacity (24,(36)(37)(38)(39). Second, we measured maximal endogenous urine concentrating capacity, as well as the reaction to DDAVP administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The urine osmolality, determined cryoscopically, was considered to be normal when the following age-related values were reached: 850 mOsm/kg for persons ≤20 years old, 800 mOsm/kg for those aged 21-40 years, 700 mOsm/kg for those aged 40-60 years, and 600 mOsm/kg for persons ≥60 years old. [10] Anemia was defined as hemoglobin below 130 g/L for males and post-menopausal women and below 120 g/L for pre-menopausal women, as proposed by the World Health Organization. [11] Kidney sonography was performed by one dedicated doctor using a Vivid 3-General Electric ultrasound machine with sector probe of 3.5 MHz.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Older adults showed lower values of maximum and higher values of minimum Uosm than children or young adults. In six groups of adults the median decrease in maximum Uosm was 3.4 mosm/kg/y (Lindeman et al, 1966;Rowe et al, 1976;Nadvornikova et al, 1980;Tencer, 1988;Tryding et al, 1988;Tan et al, 1991).…”
Section: Maximum and Minimum Uosm And Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adults urine solute excretion ranged from 1365 mosm/ 24-h in miners on a rest day in Australia (Cross et al, 1989) to about 400 mosm/24 h*1.73 m 2 in sweet potato eaters in Papua New Guinea (Oomen, 1967) and 362 mosm/24-h in results of renal concentrating test with (n) vasopressin after high fluid intake (Bendz, 1985); (K)12-18 h fluid restriction and/or vasopressin (children: Winberg, 1959;Edelmann et al, 1967;Monnens, 1971;Uttley et al, 1972;Abyholm and Monn, 1979;Stapleton and Miller, 1988;Marild et al, 1992; Miles et al, 1954;Isaacson, 1960;Toor et al, 1965;Macarnon et al, 1975;Rowe et al, 1976;Alwall, 1978;Monson and Richards 1978;Curtis and Donovan, 1979;Güllner et al, 1980;Askergren et al, 1981;Koppeschaar et al, 1985;Tencer, 1988;Tryding et al, 1988;Tan et al, 1991;Baumgarten et al, 2000; decrease in maximum Uosm at an age above 20 y: 3.4 mosm/kg/y); (&) more than 18 h fluid restriction and/or high protein intake (Miles et al, 1954;Polacek et al, 1965;Lindeman et al, 1966;Nadvornikova et al, 1980) mean values ( * ) and regression lines (-) of minimum urinary osmolality in renal diluting tests in children and adults during high oral water intake or intravenous hypotonic saline (Lindeman et al, 1966;Klahr et al, 1967;Rodriguez-Soriano et al, 1981;DiScala and Stein, 1982).…”
Section: Renal Solute Excretionmentioning
confidence: 99%