5th EEGS-ES Meeting 1999
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201406466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DC Resistivity and SASW for validation of effeiciency in soil stabilisation prior to road construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying high level tools for data modeling and visualization is a key tool for assessment of the soils acceptability for road construction using criteria of resistivity of soil strength to the pressure. The importance of the undertaken research is explained by the necessity of the civil engineering geotechnical works for constructing infrastructure and roads, as also well demonstrated in various geotechnical research [39][40][41][42][43] and papers on statistical analysis application in geosciences [44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. The soil acceptability for construction can be defined using various criteria: water content, compaction, shear strength, degree of saturation, to mention a few of them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Applying high level tools for data modeling and visualization is a key tool for assessment of the soils acceptability for road construction using criteria of resistivity of soil strength to the pressure. The importance of the undertaken research is explained by the necessity of the civil engineering geotechnical works for constructing infrastructure and roads, as also well demonstrated in various geotechnical research [39][40][41][42][43] and papers on statistical analysis application in geosciences [44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. The soil acceptability for construction can be defined using various criteria: water content, compaction, shear strength, degree of saturation, to mention a few of them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…GMT is aiming to enable cartographic visualization and modelling of a high standards, high-quality maps based on the raster/vector datasets which can be effectively used for mapping the shape of the seabed and submarine landforms, thereby providing the knowledge base to detail the topography of the World Ocean. Approaches to the geological data analysis are diverse: ternary diagrams plotting (Reyes et al 2010;Lemenkova 2019d), geophysical methods (Dahlin et al 1999), swath--bathymetric mapping (Wells & Monahan 2002;Gauger et al 2007;Nitsche et al 2007), compression strength (Lindh 2004), various approaches to the data analysis, e.g. factor analysis, correlograms, cross-section plotting and visualization (Lemenkova 2018a(Lemenkova , 2018b, geophysical and geomorphological modelling based on tectonic analysis and mapping (Serra et al 2020;Gales et al 2013;Lemenkova 2019c.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7) clearly demonstrate that addition of cement results in a very significant decrease in resistivity a few days after the treatment, which delineates the treated volume. The result also indicates that the stabilisation did not reach the depth claimed by the contractor, see the marked target depth (Dahlin et al, 1999b).…”
Section: Example: Quality Control Of Ground Stabilisation In Swedenmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…7. Resistivity imaging from area treated with cement stabilisation, where claimed extension of treated volume is marked along with cement percentage (Dahlin et al, 1999b). routinely in Denmark, in combination with other methods such as multi-electrode resistivity surveying and transient electromagnetic sounding, within a national mapping of the groundwater resources.…”
Section: Example: Aquifer Vulnerability Mapping In Denmarkmentioning
confidence: 99%