2003
DOI: 10.1021/ma021263b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DC and AC Conductivity of Carbon Nanotubes−Polyepoxy Composites

Abstract: The dc and ac conductivities of carbon nanotubes-polyepoxy composites have been investigated from 20 to 110°C in the frequency range 10 -2 -10 6 Hz as a function of the conductive weight fraction p ranging from 0.04 to 2.5 wt %. The frequency dependence of the measured conductivity obeys the universal dynamic response (UDR): a dc plateau followed, above a critical frequency ωc,b yt h eω s power law with exponent s ∼ 0.6-1. The dc conductivity follows a percolation scaling law: σdc ∝ (ppc) t with pc ) 0.3 wt % … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

41
400
4
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 570 publications
(461 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(136 reference statements)
41
400
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of bromine caused the formation of ionic and covalent bonds with the matrix, improving the flexibility of the composites, and the electrical conductivity. However, some studies [25,[48][49][50] have shown that the surface functionalisation of GNP can also decrease the electrical properties of the nanocomposites compared to when unmodified GNP is used. As the electron displacement is known to occur mainly on the surface of graphene, highly functionalising the surface might increase the mechanical properties but decrease the electrical properties of the final product.…”
Section: Functionalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of bromine caused the formation of ionic and covalent bonds with the matrix, improving the flexibility of the composites, and the electrical conductivity. However, some studies [25,[48][49][50] have shown that the surface functionalisation of GNP can also decrease the electrical properties of the nanocomposites compared to when unmodified GNP is used. As the electron displacement is known to occur mainly on the surface of graphene, highly functionalising the surface might increase the mechanical properties but decrease the electrical properties of the final product.…”
Section: Functionalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the discovery of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) by Iijima [1], extensive studies have been conducted exploring their unique electronic, thermal, optical, and mechanical properties and their potential use in greatly enhancing the physical properties of polymer nanocomposites [2,3,4,5,6], as summarized in recent review articles [7,8]. The outstanding properties are in part attributed to their extremely high aspect ratio (lengthto-outer diameter ratio) of up to 1000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from mechanical reinforcement [2,3], one of the key interests is to develop conductive polymer composites [4][5][6] preferably at low concentration of CNT utilizing their high aspect ratio (L/D) for numerous applications, which include antistatic devices, capacitors and materials for EMI shielding. However, with few exceptions [7][8][9] uniform dispersion of CNT in polymer matrix is restricted due to aggregate formation irrespective of the techniques employed for composite preparation. This is presumably due to (i) strong inter-tube van der Waals interaction and (ii) lack of interfacial interaction between the polymer and the CNT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the electrical percolation threshold in polymer/CNT composites is found to be much higher in case of thermoplastic matrices [13,14] as compared to theoretically predicted percolation threshold considering L/D of CNT as one of the critical parameters which is otherwise found to be close to the predicted values in thermoset (epoxy, polyimide etc.) filled system [7][8][9]. Additional complexity arises in case of semi-crystalline matrices (polypropylene [14], polyethylene [15], polyamides [16]) where it is envisaged that the dispersion of CNT is significantly affected due to the crystallization induced phase separation and subsequent rejection of CNT by the advancing crystalline fronts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%