DBH Distributions in America’s Urban Forests—An Overview of Structural Diversity

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The structural diversity of an urban forest affects ecosystem service provision, and can inform management, planning, as well as policy. Trunk diameter at breast height (DBH) is amongst the most common measures of tree structure due to its ease of measurement and strong relationships with other structural and non-structural urban forest characteristics. Materials and Methods: In this study, the DBH distributions of urban forests are summarised for 38 American cities with a combined population of over 30 million people and a range of geographic, climatic, and demographic conditions. The Anderson–Darling (AD) test was used to test the hypothesis that all DBH distributions came from a common population. Moreover, structural diversity was compared using the Shannon–Wiener index. Results: The AD test results failed to identify any statistically significant differences in DBH distributions. However, qualitatively, the DBH distributions have two primary forms, which have important functional, management, and planning implications. The vast majority of cities have an exponentially inverse-proportional distribution, such that the proportion of trees in each successively larger DBH class decreases exponentially. The Shannon–Wiener index indicates an uneven DBH distribution in the cities with an exponentially inverse-proportional diameter distribution; these cities are dominated by trees in the smallest diameter class. Potential explanations for a large proportion of trees in the smallest diameter classes include a large number of small, naturally regenerating trees; a preference for smaller trees in urban areas; or a recent increase in tree planting efforts. Conclusions: Despite no statistical differences in DBH distributions for the 38 study cities, the functional, management, and planning implications will differ considerably.

Valuation of timber and firewood of trees outside forest along the urban–rural gradient in Kathmandu valley, Nepal

“…Out of four stem diameter classes, dominance of smaller diameter class (5-9.90 cm and 10-19.90 cm) in the urban stratum in the study area (Table 4) is similar as Morgenroth et al (2020) reported in America's urban forests as > 40% of trees in Shrestha et al the smallest DBH class (< 15 cm) which could be attributed to preference for smaller ornamental trees as Bottle brush, Albizia, Junipers etc. in urban areas or a recent increase in tree planting efforts.…”

Monitoring and analyzing tree diversity using i-Tree eco to strengthen urban forest management

“…Natural tree regeneration and supporting their healthy development should also be a short-term goal in order to stop the ageing distribution from shifting toward maturity. The health of trees is improved through tree management, which also enhances the ecological functions and landscape services they offer (Morgenroth et al 2020). Tree health may be identified by the diversity of diameter distributions (Morgenroth and Östberg 2017;Pretzsch et al 2021).…”

Evaluation of PM2.5 Retention Capacity and Structural Optimization of Urban Park Green Spaces in Beijing

“…i-Tree is a software suite developed by the USDA Forest Service that provides urban and rural forestry analysis and benefit assessment tools. Since the initial release of i-Tree tools in 2006, this software has been widely used to quantify the benefits and values of individual trees and forests [27,28]. The most commonly used i-Tree tool is the i-Tree Eco model.…”