2001
DOI: 10.1006/excr.2001.5328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DBD-FISH on Neutral Comets: Simultaneous Analysis of DNA Single- and Double-Strand Breaks in Individual Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that ionizing radiation causes the generation of DSBs, but single-strand breaks are generated far more frequently than DSBs (Fernandez et al, 2001). Single-strand breaks are converted into DSBs in replicating templates (Larner et al, 1999).…”
Section: Indications For An Antagonistic Role Of P53 During Replicatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that ionizing radiation causes the generation of DSBs, but single-strand breaks are generated far more frequently than DSBs (Fernandez et al, 2001). Single-strand breaks are converted into DSBs in replicating templates (Larner et al, 1999).…”
Section: Indications For An Antagonistic Role Of P53 During Replicatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of DNA damage in fish sperm for fertility assessment is so far achieved using the comet assay (Cabrita et al 2005, Dietrich et al 2005. The comet assay is consistent and able to determine singleor double-stranded breakage, and may also enable DNA sequence identification associated with DNA breaks (Fernández et al 2001). However, the comet assay is technically challenging in requiring DNA electrophoresis and sophisticated image analysis software for achieving systematically consistent results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MDA-MB468 and CRL2336) cell lines [12,16,17]. Following alkaline lysis, the breast cancer cell lines showed evidence of increased endogenous and IR-induced alkali-labile sites in comparison to normal cells (see Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%