2002
DOI: 10.1053/smrv.2002.0191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daytime sleepiness and its evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
91
0
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
4
91
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Several available tools can be used to assess objective and subjective daytime sleepiness (for an overview see Cluydts et al, 2002). The Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) is considered to be the "gold standard" assessment tool for objectively measuring daytime sleepiness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Several available tools can be used to assess objective and subjective daytime sleepiness (for an overview see Cluydts et al, 2002). The Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) is considered to be the "gold standard" assessment tool for objectively measuring daytime sleepiness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, it has been considered as the physiological tendency to fall asleep (i.e., sleep propensity). However, this definition is limited since sleepiness is not a unitary phenomenon (Cluydts et al, 2002). As shown in several studies, subjective sleepiness has multiple dimensions that go beyond an increased tendency to fall asleep (Jordan, 2012;Kim & Young, 2005;Pilcher, Pury, & Muth, 2003;Pilcher, Schoeling, & Prosansky, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As an operational definition of daytime sleepiness, we used sleep propensity as assessed by the ESS. However, the ESS is a subjective rating of sleep propensity in daily life and covers only one specific aspect of the multi-dimensional concept of sleepiness [88]. In addition, even though the ESS is widely used as an assessment tool in clinical practice and research, this instrument has only modest psychometric properties.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%