2017
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daytime depression in temperature‐normalised stem CO2 efflux in young poplar trees is dominated by low turgor pressure rather than by internal transport of respired CO2

Abstract: Daytime decreases in temperature-normalised stem CO efflux (E ) are commonly ascribed to internal transport of respired CO (F ) or to an attenuated respiratory activity due to lowered turgor pressure. The two are difficult to separate as they are simultaneously driven by sap flow dynamics. To achieve combined gradients in turgor pressure and F , sap flow rates in poplar trees were manipulated through severe defoliation, severe drought, moderate defoliation and moderate drought. Turgor pressure was mechanistica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Temperature sensitivity of E A in Eucalyptus trees on a daily basis was relatively low, with Q 10 decreasing from 1.52 to 1.25 along the summer season, which are values slightly lower than those commonly reported (from 1.5 to 2, compiled by Wang, Wang, Zu, Li, & Koike, ). In this line, as soil dried out and constrained stem growth and overall R S , E A progressively decoupled from air temperatures, highlighting the crucial role of additional drivers affecting R S such as water availability and cell turgor (Salomón et al, ). These observations emphasize the need to move beyond temperature‐based predictions of plant respiration commonly applied in global dynamic vegetation models (Fatichi, Leuzinger, & Korner, ; Smith, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Temperature sensitivity of E A in Eucalyptus trees on a daily basis was relatively low, with Q 10 decreasing from 1.52 to 1.25 along the summer season, which are values slightly lower than those commonly reported (from 1.5 to 2, compiled by Wang, Wang, Zu, Li, & Koike, ). In this line, as soil dried out and constrained stem growth and overall R S , E A progressively decoupled from air temperatures, highlighting the crucial role of additional drivers affecting R S such as water availability and cell turgor (Salomón et al, ). These observations emphasize the need to move beyond temperature‐based predictions of plant respiration commonly applied in global dynamic vegetation models (Fatichi, Leuzinger, & Korner, ; Smith, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is worth noting that during the 2‐month experimental period, accumulated precipitation was below 70 mm, when precipitation records during summer—from December to February—average ~258 mm (Drake et al, ), and soil VWC progressively decreased during the course of the experiment. Drought stress leads to stem growth cessation and cell turgor loss limiting associated respiratory expenditures (Rodríguez‐Calcerrada et al, ; Salomón et al, ; Saveyn et al, ; Steppe et al, ). In this line, stem growth of monitored trees was already constrained at the onset of the experiment (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stem CO 2 efflux rates observed here ranged between 0.5 and 2 μmol m −2 s −1 and were two to three times lower compared with other values reported for young poplars. Salomón et al () measured E A of 3–4 μmol m −2 s −1 in 3‐year‐old P. canadensis trees, whereas Steppe, Saveyn, McGuire, Lemeur, and Teskey () reported values of 2–5 μmol m −2 s −1 in 3‐year‐old P. deltoides trees. Differences in E A were likely related to the wood phenological stage at which E A measurements were performed in our study (late summer–early autumn), when stem growth was largely limited and associated growth respiration was therefore low (Steppe et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over 80% of diurnal changes in sapwood cO 2 could be explained by respiration rates. The changes in the explanatory power of this relationship with diel time period (Table ) might be the result of diurnal changes in the water status and cell turgor pressure of the stem cells (Etzold et al ., ; Mencuccini et al ., ; Salomón et al ., ). A reduced cell water status and turgor pressure during daytime has been suggested as a constraint on stem respiratory metabolism (Saveyn et al ., ; Steppe et al ., , ; Mencuccini et al ., ; Salomón et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%