1988
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0830099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daylength influences pelage and plasma prolactin concentrations but not reproduction in the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster

Abstract: Summary. Short daylengths did not affect testes weight or spermatogenic index in male voles or uterine weight in female voles. Short daylengths did stimulate the growth of a winter pelage in both sexes; short-day voles had longer underhairs and guard hairs and a thicker, more dense pelage than did long-day voles. Plasma prolactin concentrations were five times higher in long-day than in short-day females and 25% higher in l ong\ x=req-\ day males than in short-day males. The effect of short daylength on pelage… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
1
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Small body size, with its associated short life span, is unlikely to favor photoperiodic inhibition of reproduction unless the inhibition promotes survival, for example, during a harsh winter [36]. It has therefore been suggested that the evolutionary pressure favoring reproductive photoresponsiveness will decrease with decreasing latitude and body size, and that small mammals below 30°of latitude may cease to use photoperiod as a proximate cue and become opportunistic [3,9,16,36,37]. This is supported by the limited available data, which show that below 10°of latitude, neither seasonally nor aseasonally breeding mammals respond to changes in day length [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small body size, with its associated short life span, is unlikely to favor photoperiodic inhibition of reproduction unless the inhibition promotes survival, for example, during a harsh winter [36]. It has therefore been suggested that the evolutionary pressure favoring reproductive photoresponsiveness will decrease with decreasing latitude and body size, and that small mammals below 30°of latitude may cease to use photoperiod as a proximate cue and become opportunistic [3,9,16,36,37]. This is supported by the limited available data, which show that below 10°of latitude, neither seasonally nor aseasonally breeding mammals respond to changes in day length [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Djungarian hamsters, weasels, lemmings and voles, exposure to short photoperiods induces molt to the winter pelage and exposure to long photoperiods induces molt to the summer pelage *Member, Academia Brasileira de Ciências Correspondence to: A.M.L. Castrucci E-mail: amdlcast@ib.usp.br (Duncan et al 1985, Rust and Meyer 1969, Smale et al 1988). Minks and squirrels present an endogenous rhythm of molt which is strongly influenced by changes in photoperiod (Martinet et al 1992) or temperature (Joy and Mrosovsky 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some species fail to show a reproductive response to photoperiod, yet exhibit other seasonal responses (such as pelage change) that are under photoperiodic regulation (Smale et al 1988;Duncan et al 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%