1998
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.1998.751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daylength Effects on Stress and Fear Responses in Broiler Chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings suggested either of the following concepts: (1) the reduction of growth in fish under extended day length was related to metabolic changes follow by light variations or (2) the growth reduction was due to a chronic stress caused by photoperiod manipulation. Studies on a number of species from a variety of taxa including rat (Vanbetteray et al 1991), mice (Van der Meer et al 2004), chicken (Zulkifli et al 1998) and fish (Leonardi and Klempau 2003) indicated that timing of light cycles may be a source of stress. In this study, the measurement of different parameters used as stress indices indicated that photoperiod manipulation caused a chronic stress, as the interrenal stress response of Persian sturgeon had not acclimated after a 56‐d period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings suggested either of the following concepts: (1) the reduction of growth in fish under extended day length was related to metabolic changes follow by light variations or (2) the growth reduction was due to a chronic stress caused by photoperiod manipulation. Studies on a number of species from a variety of taxa including rat (Vanbetteray et al 1991), mice (Van der Meer et al 2004), chicken (Zulkifli et al 1998) and fish (Leonardi and Klempau 2003) indicated that timing of light cycles may be a source of stress. In this study, the measurement of different parameters used as stress indices indicated that photoperiod manipulation caused a chronic stress, as the interrenal stress response of Persian sturgeon had not acclimated after a 56‐d period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is known that lighting influences behavior, reproductive ability, and, more specifically, growth rates of poultry (Phillips and Piggins, 1992), livestock are still reared under different lighting conditions from that of nature and most livestock experience intense stress due to light intensity, wavelength, and photoperiod which tuned by human (Zulkifli et al, 1998). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in good agreement with those findings obtained by Ibrahim (2005) and Soliman et al (2006) who concluded that there were no significant differences in blood constituents ( total protein, albumen and globulin) among birds reared under different light regimes. Also, Zulkifli et al (1998), Moore and Siopes (2000) and Abbas et al (2008) found that broilers reared under continuous light had a higher heterophil:lymphocyte ratio and experienced greater fear response than birds reared under a 12L:12D photoperiod. In the same line, El-Fiky et al (2008) indicated that serum total lipids was significantly higher for continuous light regime than constant (16.2%) and intermittent (14.5%) light, although serum total protein and cholesterol levels were not different among the different light regimes, revealing no physiological stress.The16L:8D program tended to reduce fearfulness and thus psychological stress (Bayram and Özkan, 2010).…”
Section: Blood Parametersmentioning
confidence: 97%