1999
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/14.12.2932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Day-to-day variability of adequacy indexes in peritoneal dialysis

Abstract: Evaluating the adequacy of PD by means of a single measurement should take into account the weekly variability as demonstrated by a triple dialysate and urine collection. Standard adequacy targets can be corrected to allow for variability. Thus one can obtain safe values for prescription decisions based on a single collection result.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account that the coefficient of variability of the totCrCL in PD patients, using three CL measurements over a 1-week period, was reportedly 6.0% [23] and 9.4% [34], the real MAPE of the equations studied could be calculated by subtracting the value of their variability: for example, 14%-6% = 8% (Gates). In fact, ∼42% of the total variability is due to the variability in the single fluid collections (see Statistics).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking into account that the coefficient of variability of the totCrCL in PD patients, using three CL measurements over a 1-week period, was reportedly 6.0% [23] and 9.4% [34], the real MAPE of the equations studied could be calculated by subtracting the value of their variability: for example, 14%-6% = 8% (Gates). In fact, ∼42% of the total variability is due to the variability in the single fluid collections (see Statistics).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To establish the real estimative value of these equations, we considered the coefficient of variability deriving from differences in single fluid collections, drawn from our published data [23] (in three dialysate and urine collections taken within 7 days from 24 PD patients, the coefficient of variability for totCrCL was 6%). From the within-subject and intersubject variances for totCrCL (53.68, SD = 7.33 and 75.01, SD = 8.66, respectively), we obtained the total variance (128.69, SD = 11.34), so the (within/total variance) * 100, i.e.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed variability of the results [11] with the same schedule for the variables studied is given in 291 prescribed FV ratio of 1.06 ± 0.3, while some overfilling was frequently registered during breakpoint sessions, with a mean ratio of 1.25 ± 1. Differences were found neither in drainage alarms incidence nor in subjectively perceived comfort and sleep quality indexes.…”
Section: Sodium Removalmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…No significant difference was found in variability between the different treatments. CV = Coefficient of variation calculated according to the formula (CV% = SD/M × 100) already described elsewhere [11]. 13] , tidal APD use is growing among APD patients mainly because of better PD fluids dynamics, better patient's comfort, reduced drainage pain and alarms and better quality of sleep [8] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a venous tunnelled catheter and dialysis in a total nursing-care unit were the only factors independently associated with greater variability in both VBP and URR, as measured by the CV%, a commonly used and accepted measure of variability [10,11]. In addition, it was demonstrated that greater variability in the VBP was a major contributor to inadequate dialysis delivery, as measured by the URR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%