1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf02263136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Day-of-the week variation of rainfall and maximum temperature in Melbourne, Australia

Abstract: We have examined the day-of-the-week variation of rainfall and maximum temperature using 26 years of record at Melbourne, Australia. The summer and winter half-years were considered separately. Analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between the days. However, in the winter season, precipitation shows a monotonic increase from Sunday to a maximum on Thursday, while maximum temperature shows a monotonic decrease from Monday to a Saturday minimum. Winter weekday precipitation is significantly (a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, several observational studies of downtown office areas have used an approach dependent on the temperature difference between weekdays and weekends (Δ T W‐H ), which can be regarded as the anthropogenic heat effect. ΔT W‐H has been detected by statistically analysing actual meteorological data in large urban regions such as Melbourne, Australia (Simmonds and Kaval, ), Tokyo, Japan (Fujibe, ), Madras (renamed Chennai), India (Jayanthi, ), Buenos Aires, Argentina (Figuerola and Mazzeo, ), and Washington, DC, and New York City in the United States (Hicks et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, several observational studies of downtown office areas have used an approach dependent on the temperature difference between weekdays and weekends (Δ T W‐H ), which can be regarded as the anthropogenic heat effect. ΔT W‐H has been detected by statistically analysing actual meteorological data in large urban regions such as Melbourne, Australia (Simmonds and Kaval, ), Tokyo, Japan (Fujibe, ), Madras (renamed Chennai), India (Jayanthi, ), Buenos Aires, Argentina (Figuerola and Mazzeo, ), and Washington, DC, and New York City in the United States (Hicks et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other studies have also investigated weekly cycles in precipitation. The results are contradictory: A weekly precipitation cycle in rain gauge data was found by Ashworth [1929] in Britain between 1890 and 1920; Dettwiller [1968] in five French cities; Simmonds and Keay [1997, 1986] in Melbourne for different periods; Cerveny and Balling [1998] over the Northwest Atlantic region; Gong et al [2007] over China; and Sanchez‐Lorenzo et al [2008] over Spain. On the basis of Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite measurements Bell et al [2008] found a weekly cycle in summertime rainfall over the southeast United States.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the impacts of urbanization on precipitation may be different under different geographic and climatic conditions. For example, urban heat islands, a dominant rain-producing mechanism elsewhere, may not be so in Melbourne (Simmonds and Kawal, 1986), or Bombay (Khemani and Murty, 1973). Urbanization also increases the velocity and volume of surface storm water runoff and modifies its quality, since more land is covered by impervious surfaces that prevent rainfall or snowmelt from infiltrating into the ground; in addition, the impervious surfaces are smoother than meadow, rangeland, forest and farm fields and, hence, accelerate run off (Urbonas and Roesner, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%