2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47021-4_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Day of the Week Effect in the Stock Markets of Fragile Five Countries After 2008 Global Financial Crisis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show variation and sensitivity in the dayof-the-week effect with econometric models. Similar results are obtained from multiple studies (Akbalik & Ozkan, 2017;Huang et al, 2010;Hussain et al, 2011;Kambal et al, 2018;Lai et al, 2012;Shah & Abdullah, 2015). The variation in trading volume has also been observed previously.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results show variation and sensitivity in the dayof-the-week effect with econometric models. Similar results are obtained from multiple studies (Akbalik & Ozkan, 2017;Huang et al, 2010;Hussain et al, 2011;Kambal et al, 2018;Lai et al, 2012;Shah & Abdullah, 2015). The variation in trading volume has also been observed previously.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Apart from GARCH, the bulk of literature also approves the use of the non-parametric test to gauge the day-of-the-week effect in returns. The most common technique employed is Kruskal-Wallis test that is applicable on the data violating the assumption of normality (Akbalik & Ozkan, 2017;Hla et al, 2015). It is computed as…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…on emerging markets to test this trading anomaly (e.g., Akbalik & Ozkan, 2017). The results in the paper exhibits a strong Weekend Effect in equal-weighted index, whereas no Weekend Effect is observed for value-weighted index during January 1994 through December 2007 sample period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%