1978
DOI: 10.2307/1128617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Day Care and Attachment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of differences in social behaviour with respect to early non-maternal care support the findings of Rubenstein and Howes (1979), who also found no difference in social behaviour between home and group reared 18-month-olds. With respect to attachment, the data support the findings of Portney and Simmons (1978), who found no differences in attachment between infants who had non-maternal care before the age of one and those who did not. Speculation as to why there were no significant effects due to maternal employment and age of entry into non-maternal care may be related to maternal employment satisfaction.…”
Section: Eflect Due To Age Of Entrysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Lack of differences in social behaviour with respect to early non-maternal care support the findings of Rubenstein and Howes (1979), who also found no difference in social behaviour between home and group reared 18-month-olds. With respect to attachment, the data support the findings of Portney and Simmons (1978), who found no differences in attachment between infants who had non-maternal care before the age of one and those who did not. Speculation as to why there were no significant effects due to maternal employment and age of entry into non-maternal care may be related to maternal employment satisfaction.…”
Section: Eflect Due To Age Of Entrysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Taken together, they suggest that (1) boys and girls respond differently to various kinds of home and nonhome environments, (2) later developmental outcomes can be conditioned by the infant's well-being (although the causality between the nature of the infant care arrangement, the child's health status, and the outcomes remains inherently complex), (3) the positive or negative value of a particular infant care arrangement may not be generalizable across all developmental outcome domains, and most importantly (4) no type of infant care arrangement can be generalized as being uniformly preferable or detrimental. Indeed, the considerable hetero-geneity of past results in this area of research may be due to the broad range of cognitive, social, and emotional outcomes that researchers have considered (e.g., Blehar, 1974;Clarke-Stewart et al, 1984;Everson et al, 1984;Portnoy & Simmons, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, Bowlby's (1969Bowlby's ( , 1973Bowlby's ( , 1980 attachment theory was applied to the analysis of children's behaviour. The object was not to analyze separation anxiety, which has frequently been done (e.g., Blurton-Jones & Leach, 1972;Cox & Campbell, 1968;Maccoby & Feldman, 1972;Peery & Aoki, 1982;Schwarz, Krolick, & Strickland, 1973;Schwarz & Wynn, 1971;Weinraub & Lewis, 1977), or to test for changes in attachment over time, as has also been done with this age range (e.g., Blehar, 1974;Moskowitz, Schwarz & Corsini, 1977;Portnoy & Simmons, 1978;Roopnarine & Lamb, 1978). Rather, the purpose was to search out primary attachment problems underlying children's manifest behaviour in the preschool setting and their implications for parent involvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%