2007
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-973849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daunorubicin-Induced Cell Kill with 1-Hour Versus 24-Hour Infusions: A Randomized Comparison in Children with Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Abstract: We conclude that in children with ALL a 24-h infusion of DNR has the same in vivo cytotoxicity for leukemic cells as a 1-h infusion. This offers the possibility to use prolonged infusions with hopefully less cardiotoxicity without loss of efficacy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown that a 24-h and a 1-h infusion were equally cytotoxic to ALL cells. 6 Consequently, since 1994 the infusion time has been set to 24 h for all anthracycline applications. Future analyses are needed to evaluate the long-term effect of this mode of application on cardiac function in childhood cancer survivors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was shown that a 24-h and a 1-h infusion were equally cytotoxic to ALL cells. 6 Consequently, since 1994 the infusion time has been set to 24 h for all anthracycline applications. Future analyses are needed to evaluate the long-term effect of this mode of application on cardiac function in childhood cancer survivors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 COALL 92 also focussed on the mode of administration of anthracyclines and on the drug of choice in maintenance therapy. 5,6 The reduction in central nervous system (CNS) irradiation has been an important issue in all trials. The cutoff for the WBC as an indication for CNS irradiation was gradually increased in patients with B-precursor ALL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study on DNR treatment of 77 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia showed that a 24-h continuous infusion resulted in lower relapse rates than a 30-min infusion of DNR [24]. Alternatively, another study on 178 children with ALL was unable to find any difference in patient outcome between a 1-h and a 24-h DNR infusion protocol [25]. Most studies have compared anthracycline plasma concentrations in patients receiving different infusion protocols, even though it has been shown that there is no clear correlation between plasma concentration and the intracellular concentration of anthracyclines in patients undergoing treatment [5,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in the left ventricle structure or function between the two groups, and the investigators concluded prolonged infusion time was not beneficial in this population [15]. Escherich et al [14] evaluated the white blood cell count after daunorubicin was given as a continuous, 48 h, versus bolus infusion in leukemia patients. The authors concluded that since there was no statistical difference between the blast count after 7 days that it would be feasible to give daunorubicin as a continuous infusion [14].…”
Section: Prolonged Infusion Of Anthracyclinesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The three trials with pediatric patients included in the Cochrane review were all performed in patients with leukemia [14][15][16]. In the study performed by Lipshultz et al [15], patients had high-risk ALL and were randomized to receive 30 mg/m 2 of doxorubicin either by bolus (n=57) or over 48 h (n=64) for a total cumulative dose of 360 mg/ m 2 .…”
Section: Prolonged Infusion Of Anthracyclinesmentioning
confidence: 99%