2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2001.06197
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daugavet- and Delta-points in absolute sums of Banach spaces

Rainis Haller,
Katriin Pirk,
Triinu Veeorg

Abstract: A Daugavet-point (resp. ∆-point) of a Banach space is a norm one element x for which every point in the unit ball (resp. element x itself) is in the closed convex hull of unit ball elements that are almost at distance 2 from x.A Banach space has the well-known Daugavet property (resp. diametral local diameter 2 property) if and only if every norm one element is a Daugavet-point (resp. ∆-point). This paper complements the article "Delta-and Daugavetpoints in Banach spaces" by T. A. Abrahamsen, R. Haller, V. Lim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of [2, Section 3] show that, in many classical Banach spaces, the concept of ∆-and Daugavet point coincide. The first example of a ∆-point which is not a Daugavet point [2, Example 4.7] required a study of absolute normalised norms (which was pushed quite further in [15]). See also [3] for more technical examples of Banach spaces containing ∆-points which are not Daugavet points.…”
Section: ∆-Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of [2, Section 3] show that, in many classical Banach spaces, the concept of ∆-and Daugavet point coincide. The first example of a ∆-point which is not a Daugavet point [2, Example 4.7] required a study of absolute normalised norms (which was pushed quite further in [15]). See also [3] for more technical examples of Banach spaces containing ∆-points which are not Daugavet points.…”
Section: ∆-Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is immediate that every Daugavet-point is a ∆-point but, in general, a ∆-point does not need to be a Daugavet-point [1,Example 4.7]. See [1,19] for background and motivation for the study of Daugavet-points and ∆-points.…”
Section: Definition 31 ([1]mentioning
confidence: 99%