2016
DOI: 10.1080/00397679.2016.1211374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dative for Accusative Case Interchange in Epistolary Formulas in Greek Papyrus Letters

Abstract: Greek papyrus letters preserve not only instances of the replacement of the dative case; they also show the use of the dative instead of the accusative case as direct object and disjoint infinitival subject. This interchange is mostly found in epistolary phrases, namely the salutation formula (ἀσπάζομαί σε) and the initial (εὔχομαί σε ὑγιαίνειν) and final (ἐρρῶσθαί σε εὔχομαι) health wishes. The phonetic similarity of the pronouns might have created the circumstances for case confusion. Contamination of the co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether in pronunciation or writing, the difference between the cases used for semantically similar roles might have led to confusion or analogical extension of one or other pattern, such as the accusative with verbs of writing (26a, 27c), speaking (26b) and thanking (28). Not only does the accusative case occasionally appear with ‘dative’ verbs, as observed above, but also the dative is frequently attested as complement of verbs of asking (27a), begging and greeting (Stolk & Nachtergaele ). The alternation between dative and accusative as the addressee of communication verbs is also found with in post‐Classical literary texts and the New Testament (see Moulton & Turner : 236–8; Wong 1999: 146–3; Riaño 2006: 501–8; Caragounis : 83–8; Danove ).…”
Section: The Accusative Casementioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whether in pronunciation or writing, the difference between the cases used for semantically similar roles might have led to confusion or analogical extension of one or other pattern, such as the accusative with verbs of writing (26a, 27c), speaking (26b) and thanking (28). Not only does the accusative case occasionally appear with ‘dative’ verbs, as observed above, but also the dative is frequently attested as complement of verbs of asking (27a), begging and greeting (Stolk & Nachtergaele ). The alternation between dative and accusative as the addressee of communication verbs is also found with in post‐Classical literary texts and the New Testament (see Moulton & Turner : 236–8; Wong 1999: 146–3; Riaño 2006: 501–8; Caragounis : 83–8; Danove ).…”
Section: The Accusative Casementioning
confidence: 75%
“…Personal pronouns, on the other hand, are limited to a certain number of forms and can easily be found by word‐searches. Stolk & Nachtergaele () have shown that the interchange between the dative and the accusative cases of personal pronouns is most common for the second person singular pronoun in private letters. The second person singular pronoun is often encountered in private papyrus letters as a complement of verbs of coming, sending, writing and giving.…”
Section: Corpus and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%