2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1054-139x(00)00125-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dating violence: a comparison of rural, suburban, and urban teens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
74
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
74
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are similar to findings from other studies in which efficient prevention programs were applied (Hanson et al 1993;Foshee et al 1998;Rothman & Silverman 2007). The most frequent type of abuse is sexual abuse, which effects both young girls and women (Spencer & Bryant 2000;Kayı et al 2000;Vezina & Hebert 2007;Jouriles et al 2009;Antle & Sullivan 2011;Kalkan & Karadeniz 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our findings are similar to findings from other studies in which efficient prevention programs were applied (Hanson et al 1993;Foshee et al 1998;Rothman & Silverman 2007). The most frequent type of abuse is sexual abuse, which effects both young girls and women (Spencer & Bryant 2000;Kayı et al 2000;Vezina & Hebert 2007;Jouriles et al 2009;Antle & Sullivan 2011;Kalkan & Karadeniz 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The rate of violence among dating adolescents is higher than violence among married couples (Coker, McKeown, Sanderson, Davis, Valois, & Huebner, 2000). Estimates range from 7 to 51% for rates of dating violence experienced by adolescents, with variations largely explained by differing definitions on what constitutes date fighting (Ackard, Neumark-Sztainer, & Hannan, 2003;Andrews, Capaldi, Foster, & Hops, 2000;Bennett & Finneran, 1998;Coker et al, 2000;Foshee, 1996;Grunbaum, Kann, Kinchen, Ross, Hawkins, Lowry, Harris, McManus, Chyen, & Collins, 2004;Hamberger & Ambuel, 1998;Lewis & Fremouw, 2001;Malik et al, 1997;Spencer & Bryant, 2000;Wekerle & Wolfe, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] The percentage of adolescents in grades 6 through 12 who have engaged in dating violence has ranged from 7% to 51% for both victimization and perpetration. 3,4,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12] This wide variation across studies is caused by differences in how samples were selected and how dating violence was defined. The definition of dating violence has ranged from "verbal threats or intimidation" to "physical fighting or other forms of violence"; however, many researchers have concluded that dating violence may be underreported by adolescents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] For example, researchers have found date fighting among middle school and high school students to be associated with fighting in general, substance use, weapon carrying, exposure to violence, suicidal thoughts or depressive symptoms, and sexual risk behaviors. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] They have also found frequency of attendance at religious services to be inversely associated with dating violence, suggesting that it may be a protective factor. 19 Much of the research on adolescent dating violence has been limited to middle and high school students attending public schools and single universities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%