Dating the Expansion of the Inca Empire: Bayesian Models from Ecuador and Argentina

Abstract

The chronology of the Inca Empire has traditionally relied on ethnohistoric dates, which suggest that a northern expansion into modern Ecuador began in AD 1463 and a southern expansion into modern Argentina began in AD 1471. We test the validity of these dates with two Bayesian models, which show that the ethnohistoric dates are incorrect and that the southern expansion began before the northern one. The first model of seven dates shows that the site of Chamical, Ecuador, was first occupied cal AD 1410–1480 (95% probability) and has a high probability of being built prior to the ethnohistoric date. The second is an outlier model of 26 14C dates and 19 thermoluminescence (TL) dates from 10 sites along the empire’s southeastern limit in northwestern Mendoza, Argentina. Here, the Inca occupation began cal AD 1350–1440 (95% probability), also earlier than the ethnohistoric date. The model also suggests that the Inca occupation of Mendoza lasted 70–230 yr (95% probability), longer than previously thought, which calls for new perspectives on the timing and nature of Inca conquests and relationships with local groups. Based on these results, we argue it is time to abandon the traditional chronology in favor of Inca chronologies based on Bayesian models.

Multi-isotopic and morphometric evidence for the migration of farmers leading up to the Inka conquest of the southern Andes

“…3b). The 27 local samples come from four sites spanning AD 800-1500, which indicates the continuous presence of locals in the Valley until the Inka arrival ~ AD 1410, as estimated by a regional Bayesian model 44 . The three earliest dates from the sites Túmulo I and Túmulo II (AD 830, 930, and 1100) are directly associated with 19 samples from 15 individuals with local 87 Sr/ 86 Sr values.…”

Tempo and Trajectory of the Built Landscape on Ta‘ū Island, Manu‘a Group, American Sāmoa: Integrating Extensive Radiocarbon Dating With Joint Posterior Modeling

“…Fortunately, the results of Bayesian calibration for each architectural feature can be input into software to model the joint posterior distributions of feature construction (Dye 2016;Marsh et al 2017;Banks et al 2019;DiNapoli et al 2020). The calculation of joint posterior distributions aims to assess the number of events that have occurred before some date by querying valid chronological estimates of feature construction that are produced through MCMC (Markov chain Monte Carlo) routines at the heart of Bayesian calibration.…”

Arqueología histórica en el Perú: posibilidades y perspectivas

“…De hecho, la historia entera de los Inka y Tawantinsuyu se encuentra actualmente en un estado de revisión por causa del macizo de datos arqueológicos acumulados durante las últimas décadas (v.g. Pärssinen y Siiriäinen 1997;Cornejo 2014;Covey 2015;D'Altroy et al 2007;Tantaleán 2015;Marsh et al 2017). 7 Juan Ossio también hizo un comentario muy similar durante el evento de SIAH.…”