2019
DOI: 10.2138/gselements.15.6.399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dating Kimberlites: Methods and Emplacement Patterns Through Time

Abstract: Key to deciphering the origin and tectonic setting of kimberlite magmatism is an accurate understanding of when they formed. Although determining absolute emplacement ages for kimberlites is challenging, recent methodological advances have contributed to a current database of >1,000 precisely dated kimberlite occurrences. Several profound findings emerge from kimberlite geochronology: kimberlites were absent in the first half of Earth history; most kimberlites were emplaced during the Mesozoic; kimberli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These lines of evidence suggest that kimberlites might sample deep mantle sources similar to OIBs. However, kimberlites have been emplaced in continental regions since at least ∼2.1 Ga and perhaps, since 2.8 Ga (22) and hence, provide a record of deep and ancient mantle components that spans a time window more than an order of magnitude longer than that represented by OIBs (i.e., <200 Ma).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These lines of evidence suggest that kimberlites might sample deep mantle sources similar to OIBs. However, kimberlites have been emplaced in continental regions since at least ∼2.1 Ga and perhaps, since 2.8 Ga (22) and hence, provide a record of deep and ancient mantle components that spans a time window more than an order of magnitude longer than that represented by OIBs (i.e., <200 Ma).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some rare superdeep (sub-lithospheric) kimberlites may have ascended from as deep as 800 km [ 14 17 ], although these diamonds could have been transported to the base of the lithosphere before being entrained by kimberlite magmas [ 18 ]. The kimberlite record extends deep in geological times [the oldest known kimberlite pipe is 2.85 Gyr old; 19 ] and is considered to be episodic from 2 Ga [ 20 22 ]. Over 60% of known kimberlite pipes erupted during Mesozoic and Cenozoic times [ 22 ], which could be either the result of the preferential preservation of younger kimberlites or of increased eruption rate during the last 200 Myr [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such DSRs in kimberlites have been identified exclusively on mantle‐derived zircons. This mantle‐derived population of zircons with DSRs includes the megacrystic zircons common in kimberlites (i.e., kimberlitic zircon; Belousova et al., 2002; Heaman et al., 2019; Kamenetsky et al., 2014), and zircons associated with mica–amphibole–rutile–ilmenite–diopside (MARID; Giuliani et al., 2015; Robles‐Cruz et al., 2012), phlogopite–K‐richterite–peridotite (Hoare et al., 2021), and veined harzburgite (Kinny & Dawson, 1992) mantle xenolith suites. Only one DSR has previously been dated and was found to have an identical age to the host mantle zircon (Davis, 1977), and there is no solid evidence for the growth conditions of DSRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%