2023
DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2023.2187633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Date palm-magnetized biochar for in-situ stabilization of toxic metals in mining-polluted soil: evaluation using single-step extraction methods and phytoavailability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remediation of Cs-contaminated soils is therefore an obligation to ensure environmental safety [28][29]. This can be conducted via different techniques, such as bioremediation, thermal desorption electrokinetic remediation and soil leaching [30].Chemical washing represents a good candidate for remediation of contaminants from soil via either acids (HNO 3 , HCl, H 3 PO 4 and H 2 SO 4 ) [31] or synthetic chelators [32].For example,the cationic surfactant(dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB) released sorbedcesium (up to 97%),in which ammonium ions substitute Cs within the interlayers of clay minerals [33].Maybe, the usage of biodegradable components like NTA, EDDS, EDDG, EDDM, HIDS and PDA could besafer; yet still all of these agents exhibit relatively lower efficienciesin extraction of contaminants from soil versus EDTA-Na and DTPA [34] whose low molecular weights increase their efficiency to form strong complexes with Cs [35][36]. The current study aims at evaluating the efficiencies of both EDTA-Na and DTPA in washing Cs out of soils of different characters and varying contents of Cs (50, 100 and 200 mg Cs kg -1 )in relation to the risk assessment of cesium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remediation of Cs-contaminated soils is therefore an obligation to ensure environmental safety [28][29]. This can be conducted via different techniques, such as bioremediation, thermal desorption electrokinetic remediation and soil leaching [30].Chemical washing represents a good candidate for remediation of contaminants from soil via either acids (HNO 3 , HCl, H 3 PO 4 and H 2 SO 4 ) [31] or synthetic chelators [32].For example,the cationic surfactant(dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB) released sorbedcesium (up to 97%),in which ammonium ions substitute Cs within the interlayers of clay minerals [33].Maybe, the usage of biodegradable components like NTA, EDDS, EDDG, EDDM, HIDS and PDA could besafer; yet still all of these agents exhibit relatively lower efficienciesin extraction of contaminants from soil versus EDTA-Na and DTPA [34] whose low molecular weights increase their efficiency to form strong complexes with Cs [35][36]. The current study aims at evaluating the efficiencies of both EDTA-Na and DTPA in washing Cs out of soils of different characters and varying contents of Cs (50, 100 and 200 mg Cs kg -1 )in relation to the risk assessment of cesium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irfan et al, 2021;Alazzaz et al, 2023). Furthermore, HM bioavailability in soil is crucial for successful phytoremediation(Greman et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%