2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dataset on body weight, carapace width increment and growth band count of mud crabs, Scylla olivacea

Abstract: The present paper contains two datasets; i) the growth band count (GBC) of mud crab, Scylla olivacea collected from Setiu Wetlands, Terengganu coastal water, East coast of Peninsular Malaysia and ii) the increment sizes of body weight (BW) and carapace width (CW) of immature S. olivace after molting. The datasets presented here were associated with the research articles entitled i) “Study on carapace width growth band counts relationship of orange mud crab, S. olivacea (Herbst, 1796) from Terengganu Coastal Wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The growth of carapace weight and width, the growth rate of carapace weight and width of the 30 and 40 ind/0.5 L treatments was higher, this was allegedly because the amount of feed given was able to meet the nutritional needs for crab growth, where the stored energy was greater than the energy used for body activity. Proper feeding both in terms of quantity and quality is an effort to reduce the level of cannibalism and trigger the growth of mangrove crabs [2,17] Growth is the change/addition of weight or body size of crabs kept in units of time [18]. Treatment with an amphipod density of 30 ind/0.5 L was as good as a density of 40 ind/0.5 L. Based on feed efficiency, the treatment with an amphipod density of 30 ind/0.5 L was more efficient than the treatment with a density of 40 ind/0.5 L. According to Craig & Kuhn [19], the feed efficiency will be higher if the amount of feed given is less but the feed can be utilized properly so as to provide maximum growth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth of carapace weight and width, the growth rate of carapace weight and width of the 30 and 40 ind/0.5 L treatments was higher, this was allegedly because the amount of feed given was able to meet the nutritional needs for crab growth, where the stored energy was greater than the energy used for body activity. Proper feeding both in terms of quantity and quality is an effort to reduce the level of cannibalism and trigger the growth of mangrove crabs [2,17] Growth is the change/addition of weight or body size of crabs kept in units of time [18]. Treatment with an amphipod density of 30 ind/0.5 L was as good as a density of 40 ind/0.5 L. Based on feed efficiency, the treatment with an amphipod density of 30 ind/0.5 L was more efficient than the treatment with a density of 40 ind/0.5 L. According to Craig & Kuhn [19], the feed efficiency will be higher if the amount of feed given is less but the feed can be utilized properly so as to provide maximum growth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%